It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How many times do you guys miss the IF in your quotes?
If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city.
13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it. 14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.
WarminIndy
And the first words are IF and HOWVER if,
That doesn't mean condoning, it means IF and HOWEVER.
That means IF you are determined to buy slaves, THEN this is how you should treat them.
The preferable was not to own slaves, but if you think you must then this is how you treat them.
Do you get it how Moses was giving these laws to people who had just been slaves, contrary to what people like an above named poster claims. Yes, purchasing of people happened. But if you think you must have slaves...
Prezbo369
WarminIndy
And the first words are IF and HOWVER if,
That doesn't mean condoning, it means IF and HOWEVER.
That means IF you are determined to buy slaves, THEN this is how you should treat them.
Lol! as has already been asked, what difference does that make to anything being discussed here? Are you saying that by adding 'if' or 'however' to those passages the endorsement of slavery that's made in the bible is then moral and fine by you?....
The preferable was not to own slaves, but if you think you must then this is how you treat them.
If that is indeed so, then perhaps there'd be a passage or verse saying as much?
Do you get it how Moses was giving these laws to people who had just been slaves, contrary to what people like an above named poster claims. Yes, purchasing of people happened. But if you think you must have slaves...
This is an example of how religion can make people accept despicable and aborant actions and/or commandments/passages without question.
if
if/Submit
conjunction
1.
introducing a conditional clause.
synonyms: on (the) condition that, provided (that), providing (that), presuming (that), supposing (that), assuming (that), as long as, given that, in the event that More
on the condition or supposition that; in the event that.
"if you have a complaint, write to the director"
(with past tense) introducing a hypothetical situation.
"if you had stayed, this would never have happened"
whenever; every time.
"if I go out, she gets nasty"
synonyms: whenever, every time More
2.
despite the possibility that; no matter whether.
"if it takes me seven years, I shall do it"
3.
(often used in indirect questions) whether.
"he asked if we would like some coffee"
4.
expressing a polite request.
"if I could trouble you for your names?"
5.
expressing an opinion.
"that's an awfully long walk, if you don't mind my saying so"
6.
expressing surprise or regret.
"well, if it isn't Frank!"
7.
with implied reservation.
and perhaps not.
"the new leaders have little if any control"
used to admit something as being possible but regarded as relatively insignificant.
"if there was any weakness, it was naiveté"
despite being (used before an adjective or adverb to introduce a contrast).
"she was honest, if a little brutal"
synonyms: although, albeit, but, yet, while; More
noun
noun: if; plural noun: ifs
1.
a condition or supposition.
"there are so many ifs and buts in the policy"
synonyms: uncertainty, doubt; More
If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
Indy, Please address this!
If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
How does the "IF" change anything in this law? How is this NOT God commanding slavery?
WarminIndy
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
Indy, Please address this!
If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
How does the "IF" change anything in this law? How is this NOT God commanding slavery?
IF they open their gates. They didn't have to and you didn't have to do force them to.
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it.
14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.
You have the choice and you should recognize their choice also. But if you can't recognize your choice or theirs, then in a militaristic world where life was "kill or be killed", then perhaps your survival may be important.
The world back then was just like that, and if you think people just walked around saying "Oh, I'm Jewish, no one is going to kill me", then apply that to the Egyptians who took slaves, the Romans who took slaves, the Assyrians who took slaves....and yet none of them were given anything that said IF.
windword
WarminIndy
windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
Indy, Please address this!
If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
How does the "IF" change anything in this law? How is this NOT God commanding slavery?
IF they open their gates. They didn't have to and you didn't have to do force them to.
How do you figure that? Please, read the passage again:
10 When you march up to attack a city, make its people an offer of peace. 11 If they accept and open their gates, all the people in it shall be subject to forced labor and shall work for you.
12 If they refuse to make peace and they engage you in battle, lay siege to that city. 13 When the Lord your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it.
14 As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the Lord your God gives you from your enemies. 15 This is how you are to treat all the cities that are at a distance from you and do not belong to the nations nearby.
You have the choice and you should recognize their choice also. But if you can't recognize your choice or theirs, then in a militaristic world where life was "kill or be killed", then perhaps your survival may be important.
What choice did the people whose city was under attack have, open their gates and become slaves or fight. The Hebrews are the aggressors here. God commanded them go out and conquer others, steal from them and enslave them. There is no getting around that.
The world back then was just like that, and if you think people just walked around saying "Oh, I'm Jewish, no one is going to kill me", then apply that to the Egyptians who took slaves, the Romans who took slaves, the Assyrians who took slaves....and yet none of them were given anything that said IF.
There is no justification for slavery. Slavery is lazy and it was for people who thought that they're too good for hard work themselves. See another city with nice buildings and flat, well worn roads, well kept vineyards, pastures, animals and food crops? No problem, just declare war on the city and take everything they have and enslave their people, move into their homes and force them into labor so that you don't have to get your hands dirty picking vegetables.
Then, claim that God told you to do it, and God gave it all to you, for obeying him in the first place and declaring war. That's the Old Testament.
Warminindyetc etc etc
read much? And the first words are IF and HOWVER if,
That doesn't mean condoning, it means IF and HOWEVER.
That means IF you are determined to buy slaves, THEN this is how you should treat them. Read much, etc. etc.? The preferable was not to own slaves, but if you think you must then this is how you treat them. Do you get it how Moses was giving these laws to people who had just been slaves, contrary to what people like an above named poster claims. Yes, purchasing of people happened. But if you think you must have slaves..Read more words.
WarminIndy
The Roman Empire was built on slavery. That's the truth, and if you want to promote anti-Judeo/Christian rhetoric against God by using slavery as your example, then find something that is not morality based, show us something historically based, because your morality of the issue comes from Christian Abolitionists.
arpgmeSlavery is created through scarcity. All of the resources are gathered and then the people are turned into slaves and forced to work to get back the natural resources that they should have already had for free (food, shelter, water).
arpgme The slave-masters are already selfish since they took all the resources in order to make people work for them to get a bit of resources in return. They even claimed the land which the people were living on for free for thousands of years!
arpgme If the slaves turn selfish to each other, then it makes things even worse, and this is the condition that most societies are in today. When people start to give to each other to help each other then there will be less scarcity and the enslavement will be weakened more and more over time.
originally posted by: windword
reply to post by WarminIndy
Okay, since you have been shown that the biblical god DOES endorse and even commands slavery, and that your previous argument about "IFS" and what is "preferable", is invalid, you pull a switch and bait. So now you're justifying the biblical god's command to enslave by claiming that everyone else was doing it too! LOL
You have missed my point. My point being, that guy in the Old Testament who condones all kinds of injustice and vile immorality isn't a god, God, or GOD. He's just another excuse for a bunch of dessert people behaving badly!
No you have confused yourself, God does not condone slavery.
God allowed the law of the world, the sinful world, broken world to rule, slavery is part of that law. As it is now.
God allowed killing in wars and for justice, He didnt endorse it, allowed it.
You say God condones murder, I say justice?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: borntowatch
You say God condones murder, I say justice?
Okay. You can call stoning a sassy teenager justice. You call killing a couple of star crossed lovers, caught in the act, justice. You can call murdering pregnant women and dashing infants against rocks, war/justice.
But I say "Denial a'int just a river in Egypt!