It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BuzzyWigs
NOW I can see Creationists (Young Earth Creationists) getting uppity....he pretty much shot them down right then. (Between 9:00 and 11:00 minutes in). "To believe in a universe that's only 6,500 years old, is to extinguish the light from most of the galaxy, not the mention [the rest of] the observable universe"...and to be sure, he said "when the [Sombrero galaxy light] actually was originated (what we see now), our ancestors lived in trees, weighed about 5 kilos, and had long tails."
At least he is gentle about it, pointing out the logical fallacy of the young earthers. In a nice way. I think other people wouldn't be so nice. I don't want the light to be extinguished!
Again, no answers just that they claim God had no part in it, why? Because of the speed of light no less.
Fromabove
The funniest thing though, and they would have to admit it, is that when the expansion happened and the universe spread out everywhere all at once. They would have to admit that everything expanded at far greater than the speed of light.
The Confirmed Exception There is one way around the speed of light restriction. This restriction only applies to objects that are moving through spacetime, but it's possible for spacetime itself to expand at a rate such that objects within it are separating faster than the speed of light. As an imperfect example, think about two rafts floating down a river at a constant speed. The river forks into two branches, with one raft floating down each of the branches. Though the rafts themselves are each always moving at the same speed, they are moving faster in relation to each other because of the relative flow of the river itself. In this example, the river itself is spacetime. Under the current cosmological model, the distant reaches of the universe is expanding at speeds faster than the speed of light. In the early universe, our universe was expanding at this rate, as well. Still, within any specific region of spacetime, the speed limitations imposed by relativity do hold.
peter vlar
reply to post by Goteborg
Try reading the entire article. After it details the three possibilities for light speed it then goes into a paragraph detailing the known exception. Nice try but you fail at reading comprehension.
The Confirmed Exception There is one way around the speed of light restriction. This restriction only applies to objects that are moving through spacetime, but it's possible for spacetime itself to expand at a rate such that objects within it are separating faster than the speed of light. As an imperfect example, think about two rafts floating down a river at a constant speed. The river forks into two branches, with one raft floating down each of the branches. Though the rafts themselves are each always moving at the same speed, they are moving faster in relation to each other because of the relative flow of the river itself. In this example, the river itself is spacetime. Under the current cosmological model, the distant reaches of the universe is expanding at speeds faster than the speed of light. In the early universe, our universe was expanding at this rate, as well. Still, within any specific region of spacetime, the speed limitations imposed by relativity do hold.
BuzzyWigs
reply to post by Goteborg
Hi.
I've been following the thread, and also the other one about the topic, and I am confused. Could you please explain in clearer terms what your stance is?
I don't see any continuity/consistency. Which camp are you in, please?
"there are some the believe that the universe is only 65 hundred years old... He doesn't care to tell us who those people are. But you probably already know who they are, and that's the bliss of it all. You can poke a little fun at those Christians and not even have to say the word Christian.