It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Objects found in Malaysia Airlines search

page: 9
42
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:06 AM
link   
reply to post by linda1mom
 






posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:08 AM
link   
reply to post by taoistguy
 


Very funny. I am simply trying to be helpful as no one seems to be able to see the images I know are there.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
 


That looks like a 777-300 in flight.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
 


Correct image. Now drag down a bit to the end of the island where it appears to stick out like a finger. Right with in the curve there, is where the coordinates will eventually match up. best to use your mouse/arrow keys to find the coordinates. The area in question is closer to the coast, yet inundated by trees.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:13 AM
link   
reply to post by amraks
 


Here is what that gave me

["id":128148,"overlay_id":1255,"lat":5.652367,"lon":98.843894,"status":1,"msg":"Retrieved map ID = 128148"]



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


Yes, it does. I have had that image since at least this past weekend so it could've been taken as Flt 370 was experiencing trouble. It is incredibly close to the ground.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:15 AM
link   
reply to post by linda1mom
 


it just seems a bit too concidental for the timing of this whole sad situation...and then to see debris...I just think they should take a look. Even if it was a past crash.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:17 AM
link   

linda1mom
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


Yes, it does. I have had that image since at least this past weekend so it could've been taken as Flt 370 was experiencing trouble. It is incredibly close to the ground.


Could you enlighten me as to how you can calculate the plane's altitude based on one photograph, when you don't know the satellite's altitude or the focal length of the camera it is using? That plane could be anywhere from a few feet above the waves to cruising height, and the image of it would not look terribly different from the kind of altitude a satellite is taking pictures from.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:20 AM
link   
reply to post by bellagirl
 


I have a theory on this subject.

If the USA with all their satellites, smart phone trackers, over the horizon radar, electro-magnetic imaging etc etc etc etc can't find that F'N aeroplane, then that means they took it.
Every South Pacific and Indian-Pacific nation with the support of China, France, NORWAY, NZ, and any other interested nation including yours-truly Australia has scoured the Indian Ocean, the Pacific Ocean, the Andeman Seas, the South China Seas etc etc and et'F'n'c but to no avail.

CALL ME A LIAR.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:21 AM
link   

linda1mom
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
 


Correct image. Now drag down a bit to the end of the island where it appears to stick out like a finger. Right with in the curve there, is where the coordinates will eventually match up. best to use your mouse/arrow keys to find the coordinates. The area in question is closer to the coast, yet inundated by trees.

Why so vague? Please just give us the co-ordinates! They are right there on the screen! Or place the little white cross precisely over what you see as wreckage and then click the "Permanent link" text and copy the link it gives you, then paste it in here. Otherwise we will never find what you are looking at?

And how come you keep posting images of the plane in flight? We know where that is!



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:24 AM
link   
reply to post by linda1mom
 




posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:25 AM
link   
reply to post by linda1mom
 


The 777 both the 200 and 300 are incredibly popular aircraft. The entire fleet has flown 7 million flights since 1995. A number of airlines have replaced their 747s with 777s.

MH370 was a 777-200 though not a -300.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:27 AM
link   
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
 


I've looked at that finger and the only thing I can see that might possibly be mistaken for debris is here:



And if you zoom in you can see that it is three wooden fishing boats tied together:




I still don't know if we are meant to be looking in the trees or the water or both!



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Trubeeleever
 


Right, because every inch of the earth, including open ocean is monitored 24/7.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:28 AM
link   
It's been over 8 hrs since they spotted the objects off Australia, still no confirmation on what they are? Why is it taking so long to get there? Is someone swimming to them? I just don't buy it! I feel like the media or whomever is leading us on a wild goose chase on this, it just feels like a cover up of some kind, by whom and for what I don't know obviously but I find this new debris field fishy at best.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Linda1Mom has sent me the images via e-mail and i'll post them as i receive them…..

first one….




posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:31 AM
link   
next one..




posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:33 AM
link   
Here's to betting the "debris" turns out to be old shipping containers.....



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:33 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by zilebeliveunknown
 


That looks like a 777-300 in flight.

Those are the images member linda1mom posted, I embedded it for easy viewing.
I have no idea why would she post wrong images and then tell us to look on another places???
I'm stumped.



posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


Several factors:

One: it's a long way from Australia. Given fuel constraints I gather they can only search for two hours at a time with a plane before having to head back. However ships are heading to the area.

Two: poor weather: cloud and rain are affecting visibility.

Three: it's now dark in the region.

Four: they don't have a precise location. Debris can move around quite a bit since those images were captured.

So, you have a short space of time to search a wide area, in poor weather, and now it's got dark. Good luck with that.




top topics



 
42
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join