It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Objects found in Malaysia Airlines search

page: 20
42
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 09:07 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Trubeeleever
 


You can not hack and steal a 777. It's not possible for anyone on the planet. The pilot pulls a breaker and he is back in control.



Sorry to take so long to respond to this post but the thread seems to be running away at lightning speed.

In reply to the above ,it/you can if the Pilot is cooperating with those that DO have the technology to do this .By the way I think the cargo was of more importance than any one including those 20 employees on board were privy too.Just my opinion of course.
This is also a great diversion of the worlds attention away from what may be going down in another part of the globe .




posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Rob48
reply to post by stormcell
 

Oh, I quite agree that it is definitely worthy of investigation. Just that we shouldn't get carried away.


Yes! I tried to emphasize this as well. Anything should be investigated, but the reporting on this "possible" object got way out of hand to the point where headlines and threads like this said "Objects Found!). Now people think an object(s) was seen and lost, which was never the case.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Halfswede
 


Same here.. as soon as I saw the images I thought they look exactly the same as the other reflected parts of the waves — a similar mottled appearance to the other reflections. I'm not an expert on images from satellites, but if someone told me they thought that was some kind of solid object I would say in that case there are loads of solid objects all over the image. It seems odd that they are searching that area just from those images to me. Especially when it doesn't seem to make any sense for the plane to be way down there.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 09:19 AM
link   
reply to post by Caspian234
 

As I said earlier, the idea of "diverting attention" away from other news is just silly. The world can handle more than one news story at a time!

Here are the top stories from the BBC World News site for the past week:



And here's how the page looks right now:



Keeping Ukraine out of the headlines? I don't think so...

edit on 21-3-2014 by Rob48 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 10:01 AM
link   
as I expected, the derbies they saw in the south Indian Ocean is no longer there. Those satellite images were already 4 days old when they thought of sending ships and planes to investigate. Unfortunately these satellite images are useless if they won't go to the location where they are seen immediately, especially when the location is in such a remote area that tames 5 hours flight time and who knows how long to get there by ship. In any case the derbies, from the fuzzy pics shown resembled the Chinese pics from the South China Sea, most probably shipping containers that fell off ships. I stand by my theory that this plane was hijacked and is sitting safely somewhere, I also feel the passengers may still be alive. I hope the criminal investigation is proceeding off main stream media and they're not just wasting time on rubbish old satellite images.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 10:47 AM
link   
reply to post by Caspian234
 


If the pilot is cooperating why hack it?



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:00 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Caspian234
 


If the pilot is cooperating why hack it?


I don't think it was hacked. But I do think its possible the pilot diverted the plane and took it somewhere, if he was part of some "group". We are not being told all the details of the criminal investigation so its all speculation obviously. But as long as they don't find the plane crashed somewhere then this has to be a viable scenario.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


It's always been a possibility. But it's far more likely it's at the bottom of the ocean.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:16 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


It's always been a possibility. But it's far more likely it's at the bottom of the ocean.


How so?

Either it would have floated back up to the top or be in a million pieces.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:25 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


It's always been a possibility. But it's far more likely it's at the bottom of the ocean.



actually I feel the opposite, the more time passes without anything being found, or anything floating up to some random beach then the more the likeliness that this is an elaborate and unprecedented hijacking. Even if that plane isn't used in a future terror attack, they, whomever they are found out a lot about radar capabilities, response time and how countries work together on such issues.... To say the least they haven't really worked well together with much transparency and this is very disturbing to say the least.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:28 AM
link   
reply to post by QueenofSpades
 


There is always fairly large debris on the bottom in accidents like this. At least some of the fuselage remains intact, if flattened and shattered.

As for floating debris you are talking about pieces as small as a magazine or smaller floating in an area that covers 2 MILLION miles total area.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


A 200 foot long plane, reduced to very small pieces in a 2 million mile area. That's like trying to find just the head of a pin in the middle of four haystacks.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 11:33 AM
link   

Zaphod58
reply to post by Cydonia2012
 


A 200 foot long plane, reduced to very small pieces in a 2 million mile area. That's like trying to find just the head of a pin in the middle of four haystacks.


Easy.....highly sensitive metal detector.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by linda1mom
 


www.dailymail.co.uk...

I'm sure this is about where you said you saw the plane.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Did someone finally listen to Courtney Love??




posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 01:08 PM
link   

jessejamesxx
Did someone finally listen to Courtney Love??


You know how some musicians work. They hear something and then make it their own.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 01:21 PM
link   
Ya..the objects (which never existed) floated for 10 days, till one of your 30+ satellites got them in a snap. Ironically they drown just when the ships arrive!
why didn't you use any of your UAVs or mid-air-refuelable helicopters to get there

A 5th grader can question these things. Stop thinking we are stupid!



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 01:27 PM
link   
I saw a listing on Craigs List for a used Boeing 777 being sold "as is", i wonder if this could be it.



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 01:30 PM
link   

siddharth
A 5th grader can question these things. Stop thinking we are stupid!

Yes, little kids can question lots of things. "Daddy, why...? Daddy, why...?"

They ask lots of questions, they just never listen to the answers.

If you think it's so easy to find debris in a couple of million square miles of ocean, then fly on down there and help them out!



posted on Mar, 21 2014 @ 01:58 PM
link   
I am going with the onboard fire.

That would account for the plane rising to 45,000 feet as the passengers left there seats and went to the back of the plane away from the fire coming through the floor.

Then as the passengers and crew died from lack of oxygen due to a burned through hull so did the fire.

The pilots had already started turning back and when the passengers and crew died the planes autopilot just followed the last set coarse till the plane ran out of fuel.

As the plane ran out of fuel the autopilot would sill have kept it level and maybe a little nose up because of the trim being off from the passengers being in the back of the plane and it would have pancaked in the water without breaking up in little pieces.

edit on 21-3-2014 by ANNED because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join