posted on Mar, 20 2014 @ 11:18 AM
So... basically... it's open to interpretation. Like I thought. Also, I figured it would be something along those lines. I suppose I was hoping for a
more concise consensus. My original thought being; There is no such list, so no sources are valid, as every source will have someone claiming
opposition. So basically, my original thought of people asking for sources, or people saying that such-and-such website isn't valid, are both
wastes of time, as no one will ever accept the same sources as canonical.
Answer being: No source is valid, and people should just stop asking for a 'credible' one, because one doesn't exist.