It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
She said way too much that it just makes her seem like a conspiracy theorist instead of a whistlerblower. She should have focused on one topic (like if i saw a ghost, i will tell you i saw a ghost, not tell you about how i KNOW the after-life is supposed to be, or how the government lies about immortality, etc.) she mentioned things she has no proof of and couldnt 'back up' and went way off course- and that to me means she fell down the rabbit-hole and was spewing things she read up on and believes in.
3rd Court Case.
They cannot understand what her claims actually are.
This is the same phenomena seen when interviewer's actually press her on her statements.
It simply turns out to be a feeling she has that is unfounded in fact.
Always a tough call when you have someone with impeccable credentials, and at first they sound like a true whistleblower, but then they start going off the deep end, and you have to back away from some of the ideas because they're just too -out there-
shes a mental
same meat different gravy...
what kind of head fits crowns like this?
somebody came out after the ice age and civilized people here and there.
we can't say exactly who they were yet either way
edit on Tuepm3b20143America/Chicago17 by Danbones because: (no reason given)