It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While this is admirable, and socially polite....it seems to pass off the blame of a minor being here to the MODS, instead of the parents.
I have always modded on a policy that kids are on the site and avatars, links, etc should have them in mind as well. We are well aware of the vulnerabilites of kids, and are conscious about maintaining a "safe for kids" board structure.
Not nessisarilly, just look at movie/game rating system....adult themes include nudity, language, subject matter, and violence among criteria....it is also suject to the level at which these adult themes are expressed....a butt shot is not the same as full frontal nudity, a fist fight isnt the same as showing a person getting shot in the head or dismembered by an axe wielding guy in a hocky mask.
Unfortunalty the concept of an "adult" board is merely one that includes porn.
KEEPING YOUR KID SAFE IS THE JOB OF THE PARENTS NOT EVERYONE ELSE!
I depend on the moderators to continue to do the good work that will keep these young people safe.
We're not baby-sitters, nor surrogate parents here. We assume that people who come to this discussion board has the advance permission of whoever (parents or employer) allows their Internet access.
Originally posted by JustAnIllusion
Wow.
This is just the reason I do not post my age. I know that some idiots base their judgements on people in accordance with their age rather than their opinions or knowledge on certain subjects. *sighs*
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
I agree, children should not be hanging around this place, they should be learning from their parents.
However,
It isn't our position or ability to screen children out of here, and asa SO said, we can only assume that the children that are here are here because their guardians are allowing it.
We try and keep the board free of filth and vulgarity so that this place is fit for both ladies and the young. That's the most we can do.
Don't look to this web site to cure the ills of decaying societies in that regard.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Banning was not nor was it deemed an appropriate response. The member was entitled to say what he or she felt, despite our collective disapproval.
seekerof
Do you REALLY think this is prejudice, or is this a basically held idea that youth, (children) have not yet had enough time under their belt to have either a broad education or enough practical real world experiance to extrapolate on some of the complex ideas discussed?
Eventually age will not mean as much, but it will take a few more years for people to get rid of that prejudice.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Does anyone realize that the author of this thread has been AWOL since the original posts were made?
Make me wonder about the sincerity of the thread.
Originally posted by Notme
Maybe instead of a age verification system (unreliable like Byrd said) maybe an IQ test would work better
www.iqtest.com...
Originally posted by ZeroDeep
I don't think that's an attemp at anything provacative.
hi!anti goverment 14 year old looking for news on conspiracies
if you have goverment conspiracy news please email it 2 me @ [email protected]
Originally posted by Chuck Stevenson
Originally posted by ZeroDeep
I don't think that's an attemp at anything provacative.
hi!anti goverment 14 year old looking for news on conspiracies
if you have goverment conspiracy news please email it 2 me @ [email protected]
I do.
Let's just tell the tyke all about all our conspiracies and secret plans and such shall we?
Then wait for the knock on the door.
Originally posted by NWObringer
I'm actually 15 so I happend to disagree with you. However, anyone 14 and under should definately not be in this site.