It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Investigations into the flight simulator taken from the missing pilot's home showed a software for five practice runaways, including one belonging to the United States, Berita Harian reported today.
"Among the software we checked so far is the Male International Airport in Maldives, three airports in India and Sri Lanka, and one belonging to the US military base in Diego Garcia. All have a runway length of 1,000 metres," a source told the Malay daily.
Vasa Croe
Agit8dChop
Everyone's focusing on the plane.. the people on the plane.. now the controls on the plane.
why are none of the governments mentioning the fact that his plane was taken over by someone on the GROUND!
Im assuming you can explain how this would be possible from a VERY technical standpoint? If possible then why is it just now being done to this one plane?
Do you seriously believe a plane can be taken over from someone on the ground? And I guess they had a boat following them in the water so they wouldn't lose contact?
Vasa Croe
Agit8dChop
Everyone's focusing on the plane.. the people on the plane.. now the controls on the plane.
why are none of the governments mentioning the fact that his plane was taken over by someone on the GROUND!
Im assuming you can explain how this would be possible from a VERY technical standpoint? If possible then why is it just now being done to this one plane?
Do you seriously believe a plane can be taken over from someone on the ground? And I guess they had a boat following them in the water so they wouldn't lose contact?
Agit8dChop
Vasa Croe
Agit8dChop
Everyone's focusing on the plane.. the people on the plane.. now the controls on the plane.
why are none of the governments mentioning the fact that his plane was taken over by someone on the GROUND!
Im assuming you can explain how this would be possible from a VERY technical standpoint? If possible then why is it just now being done to this one plane?
Do you seriously believe a plane can be taken over from someone on the ground? And I guess they had a boat following them in the water so they wouldn't lose contact?
You think I'm privvy to the technical know how of government agencies?
In today's day and age, I think it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to imagine governments have the ability to remotely control planes.
Why not other planes? because its one of those things you can only use once, then the cats out of the bag. Plus, governments wouldn't have much use for taking over planes for what ever reason.. this was a special flight.
If another plane vanished in the same circumstances, people would start waking up to the fact that this wasn't a terrorist hijacking.
Malaysia and china have done everything to throw other nations of the trail/scent of this aircraft. They've withheld vital information even gone as far as to doctor fake emails from oil rig workers so the world looks to the east!
that should give you some hints.
aLLeKs
reply to post by QuantumEffects
So Diego Garcia is still in the focus... interesting.
Actually German news mentioned yesterday, that it could have been a planed attack on Diego Garcia, but the plane got shot down by the US.
With all this theories arround, I wonder what we will get presented as the truth.
Btw. this is not the first plane that gets stolen, there was another one in 2003. An American Airlines plane with the plane registration number N844AA got stolen from the DeFevereiro International Airport in Luanda.... and nobody knows where it is now
Agit8dChop
Vasa Croe
Agit8dChop
Everyone's focusing on the plane.. the people on the plane.. now the controls on the plane.
why are none of the governments mentioning the fact that his plane was taken over by someone on the GROUND!
Im assuming you can explain how this would be possible from a VERY technical standpoint? If possible then why is it just now being done to this one plane?
Do you seriously believe a plane can be taken over from someone on the ground? And I guess they had a boat following them in the water so they wouldn't lose contact?
You think I'm privvy to the technical know how of government agencies?
In today's day and age, I think it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to imagine governments have the ability to remotely control planes.
Why not other planes? because its one of those things you can only use once, then the cats out of the bag. Plus, governments wouldn't have much use for taking over planes for what ever reason.. this was a special flight.
If another plane vanished in the same circumstances, people would start waking up to the fact that this wasn't a terrorist hijacking.
Malaysia and china have done everything to throw other nations of the trail/scent of this aircraft. They've withheld vital information even gone as far as to doctor fake emails from oil rig workers so the world looks to the east!
that should give you some hints.
Agit8dChop
Everyone's focusing on the plane.. the people on the plane.. now the controls on the plane.
why are none of the governments mentioning the fact that his plane was taken over by someone on the GROUND!
Vasa Croe
reply to post by QuantumEffects
I wouldn't imagine he left anything on that simulator that would give any idea of where this plane is. If this is just a first phase of an operation that would be a big mistake on his part.
That being said....my theory had it landing in Maldives.edit on 3/17/14 by Vasa Croe because: (no reason given)
Sandcastler
Maybe flight 370 was a test case for taking over a jet remotely or at least other means than manual control. Pre-programmed route changes. Pilots fighting against the computer system leads to these wild swings in altitude and direction. Just a thought.
According to investigators, it appears that a waypoint was added to the planned route. Pilots do that in the ordinary course of flying if air traffic controllers tell them to take a different route, to avoid weather or traffic. But in this case, the waypoint was far off the path to Beijing.
Dutchowl
That's complete BS. The plane was hijacked with the help of one or both pilots and Iranian and possibly other nationals( maybe Russian) took control and have flown it into Iran, or Russia.
This plane will be used to commit an horrific act of terrorism designed to start another cold war and mass paranoia. Maybe to keep everybody's favorite idiot... Obama... in power so they can keep pulling his strings.
I saw on the news this morning they have determined the turn was programmed into the planes computer and are making a big deal out of it. That doesn't mean squat. There are three ways to turn the plane. 1. Manually fly it - we almost never do this at cruise altitude. Like 99.999% of the time. Pretty much we only hand fly for takeoff and landing and below 10000 feet at individual pilots discretion. 2. Turn the heading selector on the autopilot control panel. 3. Program the turn into the FMS (flight management system = planes computer) and let the FMS make the turn. 2 & 3 are the way the airplane is normally to pretty much always operated. We already know that whoever was in control new how to operate the transponder so obviously they knew what they were doing. The fact they made the turn without manually flying the jet tells us nothing we didn't already know. Can't stand the stupid media reporting in these cases. Gets people all spun up over an insignificant fact.