It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“It is conceivable that the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 plane is ‘cloaked,’ hiding with high-tech electronic warfare weaponry
that exists and is used,” a Before It’s News story claims. “In fact, this type of technology is precisely the expertise of Freescale, that has
20 employees on board the missing flight.”
Freescale’s commercial products can meet the requirements of applications such as avionics, electronic warfare, and battlefield communications,
according to the company’s website.
Freescale RF has launched a major initiative dedicated to serving the RF power needs of the U.S. aerospace and defense (A&D) sector, and
has established a team of specialists dedicated to supporting defense customers.
Freescale's commercial products can meet the requirements of applications such as:
Battlefield communications
Avionics
HF through L- and S-Band radar
Missile guidance
Electronic warfare
Identification, friend or foe (IFF)
PlanetXisHERE
Here is the patent. The date and awarding of it certainly match up with the theory.
FissionSurplus
Freescale’s commercial products can meet the requirements of applications such as avionics, electronic warfare, and battlefield communications, according to the company’s website.
Freescale's commercial products can meet the requirements of applications such as:
Battlefield communications
Avionics
HF through L- and S-Band radar
Missile guidance
Electronic warfare
Identification, friend or foe (IFF)
So there may have been a few on board who knew how to shut off the transponder, etc.
F4guy
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
The 4 Chinese individuals were not the patent owners. They were the original applicants. As shown by the Patent, it had already been assigned to Freestyle. Freestyle was already the owner by assignment, so its position was not improved by the applicants death. Take a look at Title 35 of the US Code, Section 261.
PlanetXisHERE
F4guy
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
The 4 Chinese individuals were not the patent owners. They were the original applicants. As shown by the Patent, it had already been assigned to Freestyle. Freestyle was already the owner by assignment, so its position was not improved by the applicants death. Take a look at Title 35 of the US Code, Section 261.
That is true, it is clearly stated in the patent. Maybe the ownership details were changed after the disappearance - assuming these applicants are missing even though it says they weren't on the plane. This theory is easily put to bed by discovering the status of the "applicants" for this patent, if they are alive and well this theory is DOA, if they are missing the theory has some legs. I wonder if their present status can be checked on Facebook or LinkedIn or something like that.
xenthuin
These days it is very common for the inventors to not be owners of their patents. It is quite expensive to get something patented and most people in the semiconductor industry work for companies they do not own (who own the intellectual property their employees come up with).edit on 3/15/2014 by xenthuin because: Typoedit on 3/15/2014 by xenthuin because: Another typo
PlanetXisHERE
Here is the patent. The date and awarding of it certainly match up with the theory.
AndyMayhew
Kidnapping/killing everyone on a plane seems a bit extreme over a fairly mudane patent?
Its not as though they have patented cold fusion or anti-gravity or powering cars using tap-water .... or even anything of military significance.
Crakeur
reply to post by thesmokingman
you mean I didn't need to spend 3 seconds disproving it?
that's time I'll never get back.