I see a trend here. Everything that has to do with U.F.O.'s, Psi or the Paranormal is put into the prison of the unexplained. Why can't we explain or
identify some U.F.O.'s and say there most likely craft flown by extraterrestrial beings?
There's mountains of evidence to support this conclusion. Let me say this again. The conclusion is SOME of these U.F.O.'s are mostly likely controlled
by extraterrestrial beings.
Why can't I reach this conclusion based on the available evidence? Why do I have to put everything that skeptics disagree with into the black hole of
U.F.O.'s are called Unidentified Flying Objects. This doesn't mean we can't identify some of them based on the available evidence.
People have never seen parallel universes yet people have reached the conclusion based on the available evidence that parallel universes exist.
Hawking Radiation has never been detected yet people have come to the conclusion based on the available evidence that Hawking Radiation exists.
I can go on and on.
I have seen 3 U.F.O.'s and 2 were up close.
You have people like Hawking saying Aliens almost certainly exist and Kaku saying Aliens exist but people are quick to say but Aliens have never
visited Earth. WHAT?????????
How can you say extraterrestrials exist but then limit the technology of an Alien civilization based on our current understanding of physics? That
makes no sense. In ten years we may find another energy source or a new particle that can change our current understanding of physics. It's saying
that every civilization in the universe has to be limited to our current understanding of physics. Again I say, WHAT??????????
I just talked to a Detective who was on the Police Force for over 30 years. He worked with a Psychic on several cases and he told me about one where
they were stumped and the Psychic gave them the killers last name, told them what street he lives on and said he would have a goatee and long hair.
Guess what? The killer lived on the street the Psychic told them. Had the same last name the Psychic told them. He also had hair that went past his
shoulders and a goatee.
Now, what am I supposed to do here? Take the word of a skeptic that had nothing to do with the case and believe that the Detective must be an idiot.
Or should I listen to the Detective with over 30 years experience who worked these cases?
I believe Psychics exist but it has nothing to do with anything magical or supernatural. It most likely has to do with non locality and space-time.
At the end of the day, I'm supposed to just stick my head in the sand and say these things can't be explained and this is because the explanation
doesn't agree with the skeptics belief system. So it could never be Psychic Ability exist, it always has to be Psychic Ability is unexplained or it's
just a bunch of stupid cops who get bamboozled by old ladies.
Like I said, I think a lot of these things have explanations but their just kept in the unexplained prison because the explanation doesn't agree with
the skeptics pre-existing belief.
edit on 14-3-2014 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)
edit on 14-3-2014 by
neoholographic because: (no reason given)