It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Leonidas
I have a couple of questions, if that's ok:
1. Are you mad because the ACA is a disaster, or because it even exists?
Leonidas
2. A nation's military exists, at least in part, to protect it's citizens. Military expenditures are paid for by taxes, so how is that stealing from you to care for other people? Aren't they similar principles?
macman
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
Since when does empathy equate to taking from me to give to others?
JohnnyCanuck
Doc, I know you're no dummy, so I suggest you really look into this. Do it from the point of "Why are Canadians so much happier with their health care than Americans?"
NavyDoc
You feel that your healthcare is available to all but you've already seen the limitations. Great if you have a hangnail, really bad if you need an MRI or a new hip or have cancer or something new. The drugs and technology that your system uses, our system developes. You don't want socialized medicine in the US because then you stop the sourch of most of the world's innovation and your system would suffer from it as well. You need to keep one bastion of free market, competitive medical technology out there to keep that from being stifled by the morass of socialism. Governments don't innovate. Evil greedy "capitalists" innovate.
And you might want to check out some of the research and innovation coming out of our university and teaching hospitals before you say that government doesn't innovate.
Or not, and keep following that party line of yours.
Of almost 3,000 articles published in biomedical research in 2009, 1,169, or 40%, came from the United States. As the line graph below demonstrates (that’s the number of publications on the Y axis, and the year of publication on the X axis), the output of every other single country in the world is dwarfed by what America produces. The closest contender is Great Britain, which comes in at about 300 articles. (Per the comments below, I’m waiting for more explanation of these numbers.)
The U.S. market value exceeded $110 billion in 2012, representing about 38 percent of the total medical technologies industry. U.S. exports of medical technologies in key product categories identified by the Department of Commerce (DOC) were valued at approximately $44.2 billion in 2012, a 7.2 percent increase from the previous year. With new and innovative technologies coming to market, the U.S. medical technologies industry is highly competitive and well-positioned for future growth.
U.S. medical device companies are highly regarded globally for their innovations and high technology products. Investment in medical device research and development more than doubled during the 1990s, and research and development investment in the domestic sector remains more than twice the average for all U.S. manufacturers overall. The United States also holds a competitive advantage in several industries that the medical technology industry relies, including microelectronics, telecommunications, instrumentation, biotechnology, and software development.
The medical device sector continues to benefit from a new generation of materials, manufacturing processes, and technology developed in the United States, such as nanotechnology and micro-electro-mechanical systems.
Leonidas
macman
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
Since when does empathy equate to taking from me to give to others?
What is the point of empathy - or sympathy or compasion - if it is not coupled with action?
macman
Leonidas
I have a couple of questions, if that's ok:
1. Are you mad because the ACA is a disaster, or because it even exists?
Mad that not only does it exist, but how it was passed and that is was forced down our throats.
Leonidas
2. A nation's military exists, at least in part, to protect it's citizens. Military expenditures are paid for by taxes, so how is that stealing from you to care for other people? Aren't they similar principles?
So, a standing army is not in the Constitution during times of peace.
Also, the Federal Govt is responsible for protecting in this manner.
Taking from me to give to others, in the form of welfare or what have you, to persons or companies, is theft and not the job of the Govt.
NavyDoc
Leonidas
macman
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
Since when does empathy equate to taking from me to give to others?
What is the point of empathy - or sympathy or compasion - if it is not coupled with action?
Because if by "action" I give of myself to another, that is empathy and mercy. If by "action" you mean using he coercive power of government to do something you wouldn't do yourself, its theft. If I give a guy a dollar, I am being charitable. If I take YOUR dollar to give to the same guy, that's not charity.
macman
reply to post by thov420
The forced part was regarding the Govt forcing hospitals to treat anyone, regardless if they can pay or not.
macman
reply to post by Leonidas
So forced empathy is okay with you. Sounds very very genuine that you or others care about people.
Empathy from the person is great. It is their freedom to either do or not do.
Govt empathy is forced onto the person, and what about the portion that the Govt gets after they take to give?
The Govt is not there to provide empathy, or sympathy.
macman
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
Who said I was happy???
The taxes are to be used for operating the Govt. Not for giving to others.
The tax system needs to be revamped and first put back to fund the Govt so it can operate. Not so it can provide welfare to people or companies.
Monger
reply to post by thov420
How about common human decency?
I genuinely fail to understand why the fact that every citizen of a free nation has a right to free and assessable healthcare is such a hotbotton issue among Americans.
Should our civilization survive another hundred years, I think that our decendants will be looking back at threads like this one in shame.edit on 3/17/2014 by Monger because: (no reason given)
Leonidas
NavyDoc
Leonidas
macman
reply to post by intelligenthoodlum33
Since when does empathy equate to taking from me to give to others?
What is the point of empathy - or sympathy or compasion - if it is not coupled with action?
Because if by "action" I give of myself to another, that is empathy and mercy. If by "action" you mean using he coercive power of government to do something you wouldn't do yourself, its theft. If I give a guy a dollar, I am being charitable. If I take YOUR dollar to give to the same guy, that's not charity.
Since you cannot be everywhere to couple your ACTION with your EMPATHY why not do it with your tax dollars?