BALTIMORE (WJZ) — A Baltimore City lawsuit settlement sparks major police policy and training reforms that affect everyone with a cell phone camera.
Derek Valcourt has details on the change and what it means to you.
The police department is putting it into writing so their officers fully understand. You can record them and they can’t do anything about it. First Amendment advocates call it a major victory.
When police made an arrest at Pimlico four years ago, Christopher Sharp was one of several recording. Officers didn’t like it.
“Do me a favor and turn that off. It’s illegal to record anybody’s voice or anything else,” an officer told Sharp.
But that’s not true.
Sharp says the officers took his phone and deleted videos, including family videos.
“I still am disturbed about what happened,” Sharp said.
Now, four years and an ACLU-backed lawsuit later, city police agreed to a sweeping settlement: money to Sharp and his attorneys, a formal written apology from the police commissioner and, most importantly, a new department policy spelling out expectations of city officers being recorded.
“I think it’s pretty clear people have the right to film what we do. You guys are doing it right now so it should be a norm for this organization,” Police Commissioner Anthony Batts said.
reply to post by network dude
Epic win for the people of that state and americans in general.
Awsome find my friend!
TextThe law in 38 states plainly allows citizens to record police, as long as you don't physically interfere with their work. Police might still unfairly harass you, detain you, or confiscate your camera. They might even arrest you for some catchall misdemeanor such as obstruction of justice or disorderly conduct. But you will not be charged for illegally recording police.
Your rights don't matter much if you are beat to death for being a tool.
At some stage, police will toe the line, but only when citizens start making citizen's arrests, of the police, at gunpoint.