It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
jimmyx
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by jimmyx
As a cost he must pay, by force of law, without any options and for the very right to simply live in this nation? Yes. It's absolutely too much.
Although, to my thinking? $1 is too much under those circumstances and we're still dealing with the very first absolute cost to be an American resident our nation has seen in it's history. There are many of us who are not and likely will never be able to accept that. However good the cause it's for or whatever the basis for it's existence. It's an absolute tax to live as it stands now. Little else, for many in benefit, but it is that for all in cost.
however good the cause is?....you're kidding right?...how about, I don't want to be charged more for my healthcare, because some dumbass has to go into the hospital, and can't pay his own way (that little thing called taking responsibility) because he refused to get covered, even though he has job...we have enough people that don't have any income already coming into the hospital, and you want to add more?....where do you think this money comes from for the hospital stay?....a money tree?...piles of cash dropping out of the sky?
ElohimJD
acmpnsfal
reply to post by xuenchen
I don't see how this is targeting the poor, they get subsidies on their health insurance. Someone making 36,000 a year would be considered middle class, 300 month for three people is a very fair price. I pay half that, make less, and thats with my employers contribution. I would have no problem paying that amount if I was pulling in what the person asking the question was, not to mention, Obama probably is right about budgeting. If you pay for a bunch of status symbols instead of keeping up with your health your priorities are out of order. I wonder how these people would fare if health care was taken directly out of their paychecks or in other taxes like in first world countries with universal health care. I guess they would all be bankrupt.
edit on 12-3-2014 by acmpnsfal because: (no reason given)
I make 30,000/year (2,500/month) with a newborn at home (family of 3). I am lower middle class, and do not qualify for federal assistance. I work at an office that offers what the government labels "affordable healthcare" but the price for my work insurance for my family is 550.00/month (20% of my income before taxes)!
If my office did not offer "affordable healthcare" I would have qualified for a 215.00/month (less than 10% of my income before taxes) Obamacare policy. But because my employer offers something labeled "affordable" (though at 20% it is not affordable); I must either pay my employer rate, or pay the full cost of the insurance policy out of pocket!
I decided to sign up with a private Kaiser policy paying the full cost out of pocket (450.00/month), because it was still cheaper then my "affordable healthcare" policy offered by my employer.
I had to move my family into my mother's basement and use her cable/internet in order to cuts the cost of Obamacare's impact on my family. Taking dollars out of my landlord's and cable companies pocket and giving it to Health Insurance companies. A service I have not used in 12 years (not been to the hospital or had any medical procedure performed in 12 years); without my choice.
This whole process is ridiculous. I wish my employer offered no healthcare policy, at least then we could all qualify for Uncle Sam to pay other peoples tax dollars to cover the cost of my policy. Because that is what this is, either you pay 450-750/month for your "affordable" insurance policy (though employer or private), or you take American tax dollars away from the working class to cover the costs I am unable to cover due to low income.
The only way people are paying what has been advertised as the "affordable" prices (50/month for single adult; 200/month for family) is if your employer does not offer healthcare labeled as "affordable". If every employer decided to stop offering health care, so their employees can qualify for the "affordable healthcare" policies advertised; there would not enough taxes to cover the governments portion of the bill. So they punish the businesses for not offering "affordable healthcare" bby taxing them to make up the difference.
No matter what, someone will be paying this bill, at the price of 450-750/month whether it is all you (450/month in my case); all your employer/contributions labeled as "affordable" (550/month in my case); or a combination of my money and government credits/tax dollars (215/month from me + 320/month from other peoples tax revenue).
The funny thing is the price that is best for me (215/month) is the worst for the government as a whole and the global economic situation in general. Tragic, this whole ordeal simply results in siphoning disposable income from Americans and funneling it into the Health Insurance Companies, which I may or may not ever use then telling me how great an idea it was...
God Bless,
neo96
reply to post by MystikMushroom
That program started in the 80's, not under Obama.
Hmmmm.
Guess she must be 'misinformed' then.
jimmyx
he's not my hero, the messiah, or any other made-up right-wing name, he's the president of the United States......here's the ACA, read it yourself, it might clear up some delusional thinking spewed out by the right-wing media.
www.apha.org...
Skyfloating
oblvion
Just to be clear here, you believe health insurance equals actual "health" for the public at large?
No. I`m seeing the point he was making every day in real life. The American "poor" walking around with i-phones, having cable-TV and all sorts of luxuries and then complaining about how expensive healthcare is.
But on another note: Why does a mere opinion and remark spark nationwide outrage these days? I think people are putting too much into it. There are FAR more important things Obama should be criticized on...such as wussing out in the Ukraine, in Syria and every other geostrategic platform.
Iamnotadoctor
Auricom
reply to post by xuenchen
Isn't it supposed to be the "affordable healthcare act"?
Sheesh, if this is affordable in his opinion I'd hate to see what isn't!
Clearly his quite logical point sailed right over your ignorant head.
Something as important as healthcare certainly does become affordable when you prioritise, and stop buying alcohol every day, stop buying a new iphone every year, stop buying cigarettes, stop buying xboxes, stop buying junk food, etc....
Did you really need it spelled out for you?
Iamnotadoctor
reply to post by Realtruth
You'd be surprised how much money you have left over if you stop buying useless crap you don't need.
It's not hundreds of dollars saved in a year, it's thousands. FACT.
acmpnsfal
Cable is a luxury not a necessity, health insurance is
Daedalus
acmpnsfal
Cable is a luxury not a necessity, health insurance is
incorrect. Medical services are a necessity.....not the greedy middleman known as "health insurance"
get rid of that, mandate that big pharma can't price gouge the public, and you'll see the cost of medical services go down substantially...
Realtruth FYI for people bashing Obama here. Although he and his family are out of touch, spend millions on weekend get-aways, and his wife blows millions on clothes and parties, Obama did not write this healthcare bill. Obama was the puppet for a few powerful people in the healthcare industry, that understood if they forced ever US citizen that was working to pay into their program monthly they would have billions extra. And if people get sick they can then get billions more from a huge deductible. It's simple really look at the hospitals today, they are everywhere and they have the best of everything. Heck some of the hospitals in my area look like resorts on the inside and outside. But the mere fact Obama would ask everyone to cut back on simple luxuries, while he spends millions and millions for his comforts shows he is out of touch, or possibly a borderline sociopath.edit on 14-3-2014 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)
pdawg67
The irony for me is that prior to the ACA I could have afforded health insurance that would have protected me from medical bankruptcy. Which, if my memory serves me correctly, is like the purpose of insurance.
Let's see my bare bones satellite TV bill is $50 a month. I have to have a cell phone as I run my business from it so that's another $50 a month. Losing both of those still won't even pay for a Bronze Plan which will not protect me from medical bankruptcy. I make too much to qualify for a subsidy and not enough to purchase this bull# so called insurance. There literally is no room in my budget after my base bills are paid. Oh yeah, my business depends on having an Internet connection too so I can't lose that either.
Now, If I quit paying such non-essential services as electricity, natural gas, property taxes, and quit going to the grocery store and take up dumpster diving then I could afford a Bronze Plan.
The arrogance of the ivory tower egghead fascists who created this hydra is astounding.
On the plus side, I've learned a lot about herbal medicine.
Indigo5
reply to post by xuenchen
So...I watched the video and Obama didn't say what your headline says he did?
It's regarding a letter from a guy that has a family of 3, makes 36K a year and says his health insurance will cost him 300 per month?
Which is pretty damn good by the way. Are you suggesting he should go back to not insuring his family?
Or are you suggesting that the subsidies should cover the cost? I don't know if this guy qualifies, but are you saying it should cover his insurance?
The President said that when families look at their budget, cell phone, cable TV etc. they should prioritize health care coverage above those things. Do you disagree?
Not sure what you are contending? That HBO is more important than your kids having healthcare?
What exactly do you disagree with?
Cuz the President didn't tell anyone to cancel anything.
Gryphon66
As is seen not uncommonly here, the OP title does not reflect what the President actually said.
Rail about "Obamacare" and "Tyrant Obama" and whatever; I'm not in that dog-fight
In his response to the question in the video, the President said that health care coverage seems like a luxury until it is needed, and when it IS needed, people will appreciate having affordable healthcare coverage and that they paid whatever they needed to get it.
The original article, the OP and most of the comments in this thread ignore this fact in favor of Obama-bashing.
Deny ignorance, and dishonesty.
Gryphon66
As is seen not uncommonly here, the OP title does not reflect what the President actually said.
Rail about "Obamacare" and "Tyrant Obama" and whatever; I'm not in that dog-fight
In his response to the question in the video, the President said that health care coverage seems like a luxury until it is needed, and when it IS needed, people will appreciate having affordable healthcare coverage and that they paid whatever they needed to get it.
The original article, the OP and most of the comments in this thread ignore this fact in favor of Obama-bashing.
Deny ignorance, and dishonesty.
Gryphon66
Daedalus
acmpnsfal
Cable is a luxury not a necessity, health insurance is
incorrect. Medical services are a necessity.....not the greedy middleman known as "health insurance"
get rid of that, mandate that big pharma can't price gouge the public, and you'll see the cost of medical services go down substantially...
Please explain how that solution is not "government-imposed socialism."
I don't disagree with you, and had hopes that's what the ACA would have been. /sigh
Gryphon66
As is seen not uncommonly here, the OP title does not reflect what the President actually said.