It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You are welcome. when you get into the extreme end of relativity it gets a little tricky as you have seen. none of the obstacles to interstellar travel are insurmountable. it just a matter of maturing a couple of technologies and having the will and finances to do it. and if we can find an apparent FTL short cut so much the better.
Krahzeef_Ukhar
reply to post by stormbringer1701
Thanks for that. I had it completely wrong. I did a bit of study as you suggested and it seems that it is a common misconception. I'm still wrong but at the very least I have a lot of company.
Anyway below is a simplified answer which made sense and may help others as deluded as me....
"question 1: would the voyagers think they traveled faster than the speed of light.
answer 1: well yes, sort of, but only from a naive point of view. When they boosted up to speed, the distance to the star contracted, so the trip took much less time (without traveling at superluminal speed). When they boost back down, they might say, "Wow, we went 10 light years (in regular space) in less than 10 years ship time. We went faster than the speed of light." The fallacy, though, is that you are dividing regular space by ship time. You have to pick a reference frame and stick with it. There is no reference frame in which the ship went faster than c. "
au.answers.yahoo.com...
I still think cost, motivation, risk/reward and even morality play just as an important role in Interstellar travel.
Anyhoo, I'm happy to learn and I've gotta thank you for that.
Brometheus
If humans dont wipe each other out in the next 100 years it is very possible we would find away to bend space and time. It will take longer to implement it though.
JimTSpock
reply to post by stormbringer1701
Interesting isn't it. The closer you go to the speed of light the slower time passes. Also the stronger the gravitational field the slower time passes. So we can actually time travel into the future to an extent using extreme speed and gravity. Something which seems like total science fiction but is actually possible. As for travelling backwards through time that seems far beyond our understanding at this point if it is even possible. Personally I think backwards time travel is probably impossible and agree with Hawking's views on that. But you never know it may be possible and highly risky...
The GPS satellites are affected by two relativistic effects; gravity gradient and velocity.
it's even funnier than that. being near a massive object slows down time too. this has been proven due to the GPS fleet. they lose 6 one billionths of a second per year.
yup. you are correct . thank you
Phage
reply to post by stormbringer1701
The GPS satellites are affected by two relativistic effects; gravity gradient and velocity.
it's even funnier than that. being near a massive object slows down time too. this has been proven due to the GPS fleet. they lose 6 one billionths of a second per year.
Their velocity would time flow slower than it does on the surface.
Because they are in a weaker gravity field than that of the surface time would flow faster.
The gravity effect is significantly greater, the net result being that time flows faster on the satellites than on the surface. Such that if the clocks were not slowed before launch they would gain 38 microseconds a day compared to clocks on the surface. This would result of positional errors accumulating at the rate of about 10km/day. The system would be useless without the pre-launch corrections.
tanka418
Brometheus
If humans dont wipe each other out in the next 100 years it is very possible we would find away to bend space and time. It will take longer to implement it though.
You do realize that the science AND technology exists right now.
There is absolutely no reason that Terrestrial Humans could not build a starship and travel up to 50ly...this opens up a vast area within which are countless wonders.
JimTSpock
reply to post by stormbringer1701
Interesting isn't it. The closer you go to the speed of light the slower time passes. Also the stronger the gravitational field the slower time passes. So we can actually time travel into the future to an extent using extreme speed and gravity. Something which seems like total science fiction but is actually possible. As for travelling backwards through time that seems far beyond our understanding at this point if it is even possible. Personally I think backwards time travel is probably impossible and agree with Hawking's views on that. But you never know it may be possible and highly risky...
Erno86
In my opinion...time travel into the future is only relative to star light photons, that take so many light years to reach another star system. In other words, you can say you traveled into the future based on the light from a different star system from your home planet --- take off on a starship --- say at light speed to the star, spend a few days, and travel back to your original take off point. But the result will be: no time travel into the future for the occupants that traveled to the distant star --- which means that when they came back to the original takeoff point --- none of their relatives that stayed at the take-off point, would not have aged any differently than the occupants of the starship.edit on 13-3-2014 by Erno86 because: added a word
OMsk3ptic
Einstein proved that interstellar travel is possible, and it doesn't even have to take a long time. Wormholes and warp drives are both ways of navigating the universe faster than light can travel. Obviously the intelligence and energy needed would be massive, but there is nothing about interstellar travel that is "impossible".
Slamminuk
You forget that the Universe is billions of years old. If there are other civilizations out there which are even a million years older than us, I'm sure they would've managed to come up with some sort of intergalactic form of travelling.
pikestaff
I really like the solution to interstellar travel in the novel 'the mote in gods eye' where starcraft travel between stars using what the author
called an equotential interstellar flux connecting stars, where entering at it a particular speed means you leave the flux at the same speed next to the other star, although the flux started and ended quite a bit away from each star.
One other thing, Ezekiel's visitors, if they were interstellar visitors why did they use chemical rockets to leave the earth? (ascended to heaven on a pillar of fire)
the ticking differently is a measure of differences in the flow of time. it's not perceptible to human senses for plane trips or even orbital satellites and space stations. but when you get to relativistic trips to stars the difference becomes apparent. if you experience ten years of a clock ticking you have aged ten years and your body knows it. if you experience a few weeks you don't notice you have aged. this is exactly the case if you take a relativistic trip to alpha proxima. the astronauts experience a few weeks of aging but upon their return they see everyone is nearly 9 years older older. you may say that since we have not had astronauts take such a trip it's just speculation. but no it is just a logical progression of the time differences we already know are true from observation of clocks on earth and in space.
Erno86
reply to post by stormbringer1701
Clocks may tick differently...but basically --- humans age the same way --- whether on a interstellar cruise to a distant star system, in relation to the people on their home planet.
Maverick7
Slamminuk
You forget that the Universe is billions of years old. If there are other civilizations out there which are even a million years older than us, I'm sure they would've managed to come up with some sort of intergalactic form of travelling.
Big assumption given that certain species tend to wipe themselves out. In addition there are no large scale structures that a Type III civilization would have built in evidence.
The other thing people forget is that at FTL speed, you still have to stop, turn around, get going again and that would take a long time. Also, you couldn't get to close to planetary formations using a full size FTL drive, for fear of distrupting their system (gravity distortion effects).
Again people are being vague or too optimistic - can we find space going sentient civilizations which we can relate to in our own Galaxy? It's doubtful. Appreciate what we have here people, we're likely a rare thing.