It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

My name is Stan Friedman.I have been investigating UFOs since 1958. Ask Me Anything

page: 26
310
<< 23  24  25    27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Whilst MUFON may have over 600 recorded UFO sightings a month, which ones of more recent times, would you consider constitute the best cases of proof of alien spacecraft?




posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Stan,

How likely is it that at least some of the alien encounters and UFO's are not from other planets but rather future humans visiting us from the future for some reason? I have several reasons as to why I suspect that, and would be happy to share them with you. If you are interested just private message me.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:39 PM
link   
Hi Stanton,

What scares you the most? Specific to the topic, of course.

-Cheers
edit on 1132014 by Snarl because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Stanton Friedman
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
 


I am a skeptic. Big difference between a skeptic and a debunker. Rules for the latter 1. Don't bother me with the facts, my mind is made up 2. What the public doesn't know , I won't tell them> 3 if one can't attack the data, attack the people. It is easier. 4. Do ones research by proclamation not investigation it is much easier. It is interesting how seldom the debunkers and the SETI cultists don't reference the large scale scientiific studies of UFOs such as Blue Book Special Report 14 and don't mention the Bolender memo stating that reports which could effect nationaol security are NOT part of the Blue Book system


Thank you for your reply. I am familiar with your "debunker" rules and actually try to use that as a guide when discussing a topic. I have read the Blue Book special report 14. The Bolender memo is an interesting point and will check it out. I don't consider myself a debunker because I couldn't debunk my way out of a cereal box. What prevents me from accepting ET currently is the lack of data/input from psychology, neurology and related fields. Admittedly, none of these fields provides an answer to the question of ET being real or not at this point however, During the time of James McDonald, some branches of psychology didn't even exist yet like cognitive psychology. I just see a void.

Anyway, thank you for your time.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:43 PM
link   
How many races of ET do you personally believe have contacted us and whice ones are working with the pentagon/covert government departments?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:45 PM
link   
Mr. Friedman what are your thoughts on this?. A UFO captured on film shooting into chemtrails. Crrow777 says that they are intelligent. I mean, idk...seems legit to me.


And this one is very interesting. He shows evidence of the moon being a hologram.

edit on 11-3-2014 by beatbox because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-3-2014 by beatbox because: (no reason given)

edit on 11-3-2014 by beatbox because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by RealityTrip
 


Wholesale fraud is a good term. A very great deal of what he claimed is simply not true. For example he claimed to be a member of the NSC under Ike. The Ike library says he was not and never attended an NSC meeting. He took credit for spreading to industry many important technologies after 1960. One resulted ina Nobel Prize for a scientist well before 1960. I have written an article my email address is at www.stantonfriedman.com. I can send a copy



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:48 PM
link   
reply to post by John_Rodger_Cornman
 


I have no idea. and How could I possinly know? I have neither a security clearnace nor a need to know.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:56 PM
link   
recently Sakurai prize winning physicists Zvi Bern, Dixon, et. al.) connected the strong force to gravity via unitarity analysis methods. a graviton being some sort of doubled gluon; perhaps analogous to cooper pairs in superconductivty. some claims of UFO propulsion involve a strong force as gravity rationale. these UFO theories predate the actual scientific verification by several decades. What are we to make of that?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:57 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:58 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Stanton Friedman
 


Skeptics claim the ufo experiences are all just a psychotic hallucination,psychodelic drug trip,weather balloons, or overactive imagination.

What do you say to refute the common skeptic memes to the casual observer that is still on the fence about ufos and them being piloted by ETs.
edit on 11-3-2014 by John_Rodger_Cornman because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:06 PM
link   
Stan, you've been researching flying saucers since 1958 and there are many other full-time researchers. Despite this we only have anecdotal evidence that they exist. Do you think Philip Klass was correct when he said their existence will never be proven?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Hello Stanton thanks for your time and effort. You should be titled the 'Dean of Ufology'!
My question is: If, and in the unlikely case, that the powers that be within government were to have a change of mind and decide that they have lost all credibility with the people on the alien/UFO issue and now wanted to make available to the public all the facts, including
why they have been covered up all these years and then decided they needed a credible spokesman, someone who is not too radical and has the trust of the public and then decided you were the man to do the job which would include explaining why the cover-up all these years, would you accept the job? Would you deal with, and be willing to work for the government as the man to reveal the facts and truth to the public?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by torsion
 


No Phil klass wouldn't do his homework. A true don't bother me with thefacts debunker. Many things in life can't be proven but are still true I can't measure beuaty or love. They are real. And frankly I am tired. Some of this time has been fun. Those who are interested in my books and dvds and my email address can go to my website at www.stantonfriedman.com Thanks for putting up with me. Stan Friedman



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Stanton Friedman
 


Put up with you?

Hah!

That you put up with us and all our questions is just amazing. So thank you.

BTW... did you know Canada had 1200 UFO sightings this past year? I think you've a lot of work ahead of you.


[snip]
edit on 11/3/14 by masqua because: removed question



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:22 PM
link   
reply to post by Stanton Friedman
 


And thanks for putting up with us. Smooth sailing, and thanks again.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:23 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Stanton Friedman
 


Thanks so much for your time
I've truly enjoyed following your answers!



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 05:28 PM
link   
Thank you again for being here, i look forward to rereading some of your material



new topics

top topics



 
310
<< 23  24  25    27 >>

log in

join