It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All researchers have to evaluate their sources using all of their experience to do so.
I became a serious researcher after discovering 9/11 truth.
Now I live on planet earth B. My sources are ordinary people like myself who share their information on the internet - the only place that counter-balances the deception that is interspersed in the mainstream.
I have to get to know these ordinary people through audio and video interviews. I use my intuition and common sense about the credibility of the person, and then I compare the information relayed with the information from other sources I find credible.
I use the insights I've learned about all conspiracy topics and the understanding I've gained about fallacies of reason - mainly ridicule - used by disinformation agents and misguided minions of the powers that be - to put into context conflicting reports about what is going on.
Now I live on planet earth B.
So what your saying is that if someone doesn't see things the way you do then they are misguided minions of the powers that be...Gotcha!
Also I still would love to get an answer on the question I asked earlier in this thread about all of the people around Mr. Tanner that should be as sick as him because of chemtrails or are chemtrails only specific to him?
Thanks for all of your effort Ma'am , Have you looked into the topic of Solar Radiation Management? check out this link from Jetcarrers.com
interesting thread about Solar Radiation Management Flight Sorties(SRM(Chemtails)
Misguided minions resist horrifying information out of fear using defensive retorts such as you've demonstrated.
Not everyone gets sick from smoking or vaccinations or any toxin.
And you don't know that others haven't gotten sick.
March 14, 2014
Dane Wigington has an extensive background in solar energy. He is a former employee of Bechtel Power Corp. and was a licensed contractor in California and Arizona. His personal residence was featured in a cover article on the world’s largest renewable energy magazine, Home Power. He owns a 1,600-acre “wildlife preserve” next to Lake Shasta in northern California. Dane focused his efforts on the geo-engineering issue when he began to lose very significant amounts of solar uptake due to ever-increasing “solar obscuration” caused from aircraft spraying. He also noted significant decline in forest health and began testing and research into the geo-engineering issue about a decade ago. He is the lead researcher for geoengineeringwatch.org and has investigated all levels of geo engineering from chemtrails to HAARP. We’ll discuss geoengineering, weather warfare, chemtrails and the collapse of civilization. Dane talks about the chemtrails spraying program and what compounds and particles are in it. Also, we discuss the global power struggle over the control of the weather and how it’s being used as a weapon.
He is the lead researcher for geoengineeringwatch.org and has investigated all levels of geo engineering from chemtrails to HAARP. We’ll discuss geoengineering, weather warfare, chemtrails and the collapse of civilization. Dane talks about the chemtrails spraying program and what compounds and particles are in it
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Have a look here www.metabunk.org... and remember it's the information we critique and not the source, right?
It is because in the older engine world one of the ways to mitigate contrails was to make the combustion more efficient. Burn up more stuff rather than exhausting it. An older engine, made more combustion efficient, would produce fewer contrails. Metabunk, however, tells us that a new engine, born combustion efficient, will produce more contrails. Further, metabunk tells us that we need two scales to judge combustion efficiency. It's just ludicrous...I don't know what else to say.
reply to post by waynos
Exactly what do you know about aviation, from your own personal experience, to speak with such disdain and confidence?
For him to use that and reason that because it is so small and brief in its existence proves that engine contrails are not real is either very dishonest or very stupid.
The picture in your post since you amended it shows an aerodynamic contrail, something I capture in photographs fairly often (I got a couple last Sunday when the air was very moist).
He links to another website, Global Skywatch. The founder of that website tells his story, apparently, in "My Chemtrail Story & My Chemtrail Observations." His name is Russ Tanner and this is the About Me page
I first began seeing daily chemtrail spraying in Jamestown, New York in 2005. Spraying occurred on a consistent daily schedule.
When daily spraying started (originally at 3pm every afternoon), I tasted a strong salty-metallic taste in the air, my sinuses would burn, and I experienced a predictable and consistent array of symptoms beginning within 30 seconds. Enormous, persistent plumes visibly covered the sky on a consistent schedule, every day, for years. I watched and photographed this activity on a daily basis from my large office windows that had a view of downtown and of half the sky.
In 2007, spraying suddenly stopped. After 2 years of painful suffering, I was desperately hoping this was the end of the aerial assault. Four days later, the spraying began again, but there was a fundamental change. The plumes were no longer long and persistent. They were short, non-persistent plumes that dissipated within seconds.
They still sprayed on the same schedules. The salty-metallic taste and odors that occurred during spraying events were identical. The symptoms caused by the spraying were also identical. The only thing that changed was the size of the trails.
Let me be clear: The trails had changed from persistent (long and lingering) to non-persistent (short and quickly dissipating).
Incidentally, 3 or 4 days-per-month, the long persistent trails would be sprayed for part of a day, but this was in blatant contrast to the daily, sky-saturating spraying we had witnessed before the change.
The Internet is littered with stories of “chemtrails” and geoengineering to combat “global warming” and until recently I took these stories with a grain of salt. One of the main reasons for my skepticism was that I rarely saw what they were describing in the skies. But over the past several years I have notice a great number of these trails and I have to admit they are not like the contrails I grew up seeing in the skies. They are extensive, quite broad, are laid in a definite pattern and slowly evolve into artificial clouds. Of particular concern is that there are now so many dozens every day are littering the skies.
My major concern is that there is evidence that they are spraying tons of nanosized aluminum compounds. It has been demonstrated in the scientific and medical literature that nanosized particles are infinitely more reactive and induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues. Of special concern is the effect of these nanoparticles on the brain and spinal cord, as a growing list of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease and Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) are strongly related to exposure to environmental aluminum. . . .