It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

World Bank Insider...."There is a huge Global Conspiracy"

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in


posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:12 AM
And we come to a complete Halt right about the non human non Aliens part! The only way I can make sense of it is either:

A. She is coco for cocoa puffs.
B. She is selling a book or something.
C. She is being payed or forced to purposely associate a wacka doo personality trait as part of a smear campaign, to anyone trying to expose how manipulated and controlled the world is via its currency.

Come to think of it , much like the Steven Greer effect.
edit on 14331America/ChicagoTue, 11 Mar 2014 08:14:29 -0500000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 10:44 AM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

I just do not trust anything out of this woman's mouth. She isn't taken seriously because she isn't very serious at all. Great for the tin foil conspiracy theorist but terrible for realistic conspiracy theorists. This is why so much of what she says is not taken seriously. The banking cartel stuff is one thing but even that is a bunch of repeated stuff. Thanks for sharing though. I am sure there is plenty of entertainment value out of it and she is making money I bet.

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 11:04 AM
this is ridiculous. Sea levels have risen 400 meters? This lady is SO full of #. Any proof you can furnish that a #in nuclear bomb was detonated off the coast of Charleston? Where are the seismic records? What is the nature of the premature detonation? Sounds incredibly hokey. ATS is part of the "matrix' of media, it is perilously tinged with disinformation, and this is some of it.

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 11:06 AM
reply to post by interupt42

Thanks INterupt. I can always look to the back of the comments for a reasonable voice!

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 02:56 PM
if she was any kind of threat to the banking elite, she would of had an "accident" or to be found with some kind of nefarious evidence.... child porn seems to be the favorite choice of dirt at the mo...

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 03:53 PM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

I think she is a plant. If you look at people like Alex Jones, David Ike and countless others, you can see that they provide some truth, but it is in their agenda and job to make the truth look ridiculous, so anyone outside of the conspiracy circles look at the information and see it as ludicrous and inaccurate information.

For example Alex Jones uses numerous "groups" to keep people spinning in circles and not centralizing on a core group thats causing all of the problems. CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral, etc etc. He's also a supporter of Israel, which should be all you need to know about Alex Jones.

With Ike its the reptilians. He provides good information about the Rothscilds and Central Banking but when it comes down to his main idea, it's that these people are secretly reptilians. So when some average joe sees this they discredit the information about Central Banking and the Rothschilds.

I think anyone thats from the "inside" is coming out and whistle blowing is a plant. If they are truly not they are almost always assassinated.

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:22 PM
This Women is spewing complete nonsense out of her pie hole. She is rambling on and on like a mad women.

How many times does this guy have to ask her the reasons why the Banksters want to crash the dollar?

She deflected every time he asked it, and just started talking about how most of the worlds gold is in the Philippines.

Complete bs. ~$heopleNation

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 04:25 PM
Why would a former World Bank member have info on a second humanoid species or a thwarted nuke attack in South Carolina?

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 10:12 PM

reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

I was with you on this up until the part where she claims it's big headed non Homo Sapiens, non-ET's ruling the world from the shadows. Honestly at that point she lost me.

I'm not saying it isn't possible but simple logic says there is a better answer. Banksters and the .01% elite are responsible for the mess we're in as well as most of the last messes.

Still makes a great story, always better to shift blame to imaginary evil-doers and take the heat off those really responsible.

Are you the type of person that blames the rattle snake when it bites you after you pick it up?
Well Bankers are predatory and their instinct's are to control and take advantage of!
We are all to blame because it is all of us that have allowed this to happen!
We have ignored the reality in lieu of materialism, entertainment and mind altering
substances! We have become self serving and divided against our brothers and sisters.
Until we make a choice to unite and bring about an end to this corrupt system,
then we are all complacent!
Only by Uniting will we rise but divided we shall continue to fall!

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 10:50 PM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

She says 'not ET's' .. she says this because of the ancient skulls, what she really means is 'not recent ET's'. The Annunaki have been here for almost half a million years - so skulls of hybrids, and even possibly full blooded Annunaki are entirely expected.

They have been here longer than mankind, they are still here - and anyone doing the research into the criminal global cabal will have to draw the conclusion that whoever is running it has been sticking to a plan that has spanned centuries .. millennia.

Once you have also done the research into the megaliths and realize that the tools used to construct them are advanced (more than we have today), and you add in the ancient texts and myths - then the conclusion is compelling.

The problem is of course that the idea seems so outrageous, that no matter the evidence - people would rather set fire to themselves than admit even the possibility.

I dont believe in things, I just follow the evidence - no matter how strange the conclusions - when the evidence is compelling, the conclusions need to be treated seriously.

On this TV presentation she presents no evidence, and avoids answering questions - however as someone who has done independent research I find her answers completely non controversial.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 12:58 AM
reply to post by Amagnon

It all comes down to perception. What you see as evidence I find to be a lack of any. But that doesn't invalidate your perception. See, I can really respect people who are honest about what they believe or accept. Even if they do seem cracked in the head to me sometimes. That's not always the case though. But even you see how she is either taking advantage of people with her nonsense or that she is being taken advantage of by this nonsense. I think she is mentally ill honestly.

When someone like you speaks about these things I can at least read, listen or entertain the possibilities if even for entertainment value. So respect for the full fledged tin foil conspiracy theorist is given by me but this lady seems like a crackpot. You seem perfectly sane to me though and I mean that.

edit on 3-12-2014 by Flint2011 because: Typos

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 04:11 AM
Ah ATS. Way to take a good bit of information from a bonafide insider and crap all over it. All this interesting information and people are getting stuck on another SPECIES?!?! The usual yahoos crying for "mainstream sources" blah blah blah. Humans are so unobservant and pig-headed half the time the other species could be looking in their windows and people wouldn't notice. The "mainstream" is what I watch or read when I want to be lied to. Or to find out what narrative they're selling now.

Why can't people look at material and make decisions for themselves instead of waiting for big brother to give them their opinion? The other species bit was the least interesting segment of all her points!

As ignorant as people on this planet are Stephen Hawking or Neil Degrasse Tyson or any big name scientist could come forward confirming the existence of another terrestrial hominid species (big foot, for example or whatever this one she is talking about) and it wouldn't matter what kind of credentials they had, or the good work they'd done in the past, or how respected they had been. Some people would see that and automatically write them off as crazy because they can't accept ideas outside their rigid, government-approved paradigm.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 07:10 AM

reply to post by Amagnon

It all comes down to perception. What you see as evidence I find to be a lack of any. But that doesn't invalidate your perception. See, I can really respect people who are honest about what they believe or accept. Even if they do seem cracked in the head to me sometimes. That's not always the case though. But even you see how she is either taking advantage of people with her nonsense or that she is being taken advantage of by this nonsense. I think she is mentally ill honestly.

When someone like you speaks about these things I can at least read, listen or entertain the possibilities if even for entertainment value. So respect for the full fledged tin foil conspiracy theorist is given by me but this lady seems like a crackpot. You seem perfectly sane to me though and I mean that.

edit on 3-12-2014 by Flint2011 because: Typos

I appreciate the independent validation of my sanity

The video in the OP is of course not evidence of any kind, its just someone making a lot of statements. The evidence is scattered around a lot, and involves a range of different disciplines. To detail the conspiracy she is talking about would require thousands of pages of text - just to describe - in addition, unless you are happy to take 'expert' testimony from people who are ridiculed by the mainstream (which I am not) then you also need technical and scientific knowledge - so you can actually understand the evidence.

There are other very good reasons why people cite lack of evidence, even if there is in fact a body of quite good evidence.

1. Evidence is discarded, ignored or adjusted due to it being too far outside of the current perception of reality. Objectivity is actually very difficult when encountering evidence that requires many central beliefs to be discarded. The problem is these beliefs need to be discarded first, to even allow objectivity. The best position is to believe nothing with regard to physical reality - then there is nothing to be over turned when viewing new data.

2. Often people do not seek out the places where good evidence is, because they simply dont believe something exists. An example would be that most people would not look for evidence of the existence of Santa Claus, and study the topic - because they are already 'sure' that Santa doesnt exist. While there is an infinite number of things that people might claim - and looking into everything in detail isnt possible - many people chose to not look at any such weird topic, considering it a waste of time. (I must confess, Ive never looked into whether Santa actually zooms around in a reindeer drawn sleigh though - call me closed minded

3. People cant find the evidence, are not motivated to go looking for it, or cant understand it (due to lack of technical or scientific training - this doesnt mean people are stupid - just means that the evidence requires specialized methodology to interpret).

There is always evidence of some kind - no matter what the claim is, however if I cant find physical evidence, then I generally reject the premise. While I consider testimony to be almost completely unreliable - some human testimony should be considered, for example, where there is an incentive to with-hold testimony - where multiple and independent sources are available etc. Human testimony is the worst kind of evidence though - and can generally only be useful in conjunction to physical evidence.

In short - watching video's about something is useful only to hear about a theory or premise - I dont consider anything someone might tell me to be evidence - evidence means something I can verify either physically, or in the case of documents and such - it needs to be verified first hand or electronically.

Its possible that Karen Hudes might be losing her mind - that doesnt mean that the information she is presenting can be discarded. In fact it makes no difference whatsoever - because whatever she says is meaningless - its is only an outline of some premise that might be worth finding evidence about.

Anyhow - I think Nicola Tesla and Howard Hughes may have both been poisoned with a substance that made them go crazy (maybe mercury) - so in my mind, there is a possible precedent, even if she is crazy

PS: Obviously its a huge mistake by anyone to mention Jesuits, Jews and ET's unless the entire thesis is composed only of those premises - because nothing in physical reality can be 'proven'. So she can easily be attacked on these points, leading the discussion away from her main thesis (an economic conspiracy). Thats why I always speak of banksters (non specific) when talking about economic issues - and might mention the corruption of science, philosophy, culture and so on, only in the context of 'political or economic entities'. I usually only talk about Annunaki when I am discussing their existence or non existence, and possible evidence for it. Jews for example only in historical context - Holohoax, Bolshevik Revolution, Aparthied in Israel .. its only worth going there when that is the entirety of the premise and argument, otherwise they should be ignored, because the discussion will be derailed into that tangent.
edit on 12-3-2014 by Amagnon because: (no reason given)

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 09:16 AM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

I don't know much about the "big headed people".
I have read the book "Confessions of an Economic Hit man" by John Perkins and watched the video.

Here: [url=]

From what I hear, this woman is speaking along the same lines.
Of course, she may have also watched the video and decided to add in a little "flavor" of her own to help sell her book.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 09:37 AM
reply to post by Amagnon

I do not disagree with even an ounce of what you are saying. A good read and many valid and logical points. I may dismiss information based on research or a lack of sources to do research but one thing I never out right do is dismiss people. There is always a truth in the scheme of conspiracy. She is just all over the place and most of it I dismiss. I think the poor woman needs help. The possibility of a break down with regard to her mental and emotional status did come to mind and it could very well be related to the stress she was under when she began trying to expose what she thought was corruption in the economic sense.

Thanks for the great read and wonderful reply.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 12:17 PM
reply to post by Bassago

What if it is the truth? She should change it because you don't like it. I say take what she says as a good hypothesis , especially that it is coming from someone who has seen way more experience than you and I, who has actually been in the lions den.

Stories of our origins speak if these beings from the heavens and this is on every continent. We also have the over sized skulls. Again, I say that she is being treated like Galileo because of her conclusion.

As usual we need to clearly identify where we come from and we will know where we are going and why.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 12:25 PM
All those that take a discouraging stance on this topic of non-human big heads need to stop yourselves.

I will research, verify and hold on to this idea to the very bitter end. I will not stop until I am 100000% sure that these skulls were human or not.

Don't listen to those who say they know. Look for yourselves always.

These days having this attitude is critical, especially today where reality can be manipulated so easily.

Don't give up because of a few articles that prove the idea wrong or because some Mr masks come and say STOP NO AND DON'T.

If it isn't true then nothing should be feared from this. Right?

I mean countless stories since the beginning of history speak of this, you would think that it was all made up for centuries.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 02:02 PM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

She is a plant. There are problems with the finance sector, we all know this. We can also see that it is far worse than "the headlines". What the folks in these institutions do not want is for the average Mr Joe Public to get so peed off with it all the politicians have to do something.

The answer is simple, admit to the truth (hiding in plain sight) and wrap it all up in an alien conspiracy (discredit the messenger). That way everyone will ignore the so simple.

Bet you the messenger is not queuing at a soup kitchen !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 02:58 PM
reply to post by Bellor

I have a feeling she was paid by the banks to spread this # and dillute the truth in it...water it down. She's full of it I bet.

posted on Mar, 12 2014 @ 03:40 PM
reply to post by UxoriousMagnus

I knew I had read something of this nature a long time back.

"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim - nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements [BIS] in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations ... Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world." -- Carroll Quigley in his book "Tragedy and Hope"

I think this fairly well sums up our current situation.

new topics

top topics

<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in