It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But, I prefer a small city myself, and don't like living in small communities without services, my arthritis hurts when I drive. Much of the time, going 60 km in 90 km zone, up the hill, due to pain of pushing down on the gas peddle.
I like small cities, with alot of farmland and orchards, vineyards, greenhouses, surrounding.
The ideal situation would be varied. ie. townhouses, not bare bones, with stairs, no lifts for elderly, no second bathroom downstairs, and some awful builder who snuck in and stole the insulation out after the inspection as is done in the Okanagan by a certain company. ....
....Eco farms, with 20 acre farms, 100 acre farms in some cases, and many homes, with ample yards around them, say 1/3-1/2 acre each, greenhouse in back, cottage for elderly or child.
Townhouses, 3-4 bedroom, 1 1/2 times the current, joined with greenhouses, huge back yards and front, privacy. Good soundproofing and lifts for elderly.
Things should be designed for people, for families, for both FORM AND FUNCTION.
And family farms with wonderful eco homes, producing their own clean energy in abundance, and aquaponics.
Ideally if I had my home in the city for my rather large family, it would be 3000 square feet including everything, no basement, lift to upstairs, and stairs, produce its own energy, have a back lane entrance and 1000 foot cottage for my mother, have 1/3 acre lots for lilacs, and forsythia and trumpet vine, and clematis, and grapes and a beautiful large greenhouse off to side with aquaponics.
One day i would be in the cottage and one my sons family in the house.
But I don't even think they should be legally allowed to build skyscrapers, nor should anyone visit or work in them. they're dangerous, and not natural.
Not only that, but all the housework, yardwork, growing food, not all really, but alot of it, can already be automated. There is no reason for the slavery and drudgery of this planet. NONE! We're way past the stage of jungle survival. We don't have to reinvent the wheel. We can take ET home! I am not joking when i say want my own r2d2.
Recycled tires and could be hempstone finish for me. While the water is all rain, and the electricity all solar/wind, I'd up that a bit, and rain is fukushima now! Recycle water, then its not scarsity either.
All the mining down, so much can be done by recycling, by plant resins, and even home grown quartz and crystals.
Aquaponics, they produced over 1 million pounds of produce and 10000 fish per year on 3 acres.
High rise living yes.
Loads of said high rises crammed into concentrated spaces living far out of sync with nature, aka the cities of today; hell no.
Its always made me wonder why the small town model does not include high rise. i.e. why can't future living be small high rise town with say 10,000 people living in a square mile with at least 30 miles of farmland in every direction around it.
There's your mistake right there; you are assuming that you would only put in 4 people per 20 acres.
In reality one acre can feed 4 - 8 people. So, in fact 20 acres could support up to 160 people. Yep, you could build one small apartment block on 20 acres and it would feed them all.
With today's technology only one person would be needed to farm 20 acres. Heck, my dad had a 200 acre dairy farm that he ran by himself 90% of the time.
Putting notions of revolutionary farming methods mentioned in this thread aside, you do still realise that cities or not, most of the land surface of the planet that is not city is farm right now don't you? Farmland is steadily growing and if our population continues to grow, we will use every little bit of land we can.
swanne
reply to post by starheart
Wow, seems like you really took the time to run the figures and present it in a complete thread. I can tell you've put alot of work here. ATS need more threads like this.
S&F from me.
Now imagine if we colonize other planets instead of wasting resources and warring against each others. Goodbye overpopulation - estimates show that the Solar System can support trillions.
edit on 8-3-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)
ketsuko
Well, hello Agenda 21. The more we allow them to pack us into concentrated urban areas like so many rats in a cage, the more control over us they have.
Sorry, family has some land, and we will hold it to our last breath. Land is liberty. Cities foster tyranny.
thisguyrighthere
If I have to move back to a city I will start burning buildings and murdering people.
Leaving the city is the only thing that's kept me happy, sane and calm.
No good comes from living above, below and surrounded by other people.
thisguyrighthere
into a city where living is dirty, crime-ridden and cheap.
jibajaba
my 2 cents - I think people in the crete (born in the city or concrete) have more of a stress related life style.
Always having to work for the very basics of what makes us human.
Farm life can be stressful and at times a bit depressing. There are the everyday issues of family life, balancing budgets, planning for the future and keeping up with developments in your area of farming. The added pressures of managing a farm during difficult times like floods, market fluctuations or droughts can sometimes seem overwhelming.
Farming can be stressful in the best of times. Financial worries, unpredictable weather, plant pests, livestock diseases, and isolation all contribute to farmers’ anxiety. University of Maine Cooperative Extension recommends the following resources to help farmers and their families who are under stress.
Haven't you seen the proliferation of videos and stories of people who are lying there on the street dying and everyone just walks right by them without stopping to help?
So, do you want to rethink your statement about how help is only a doorway away? If learning to live with other people means simply learning how to ignore them when they need you, then what does it matter if we're so far away from our neighbors or right next door to them? Clearly, it doesn't seem to matter much either way.
We tried that in the 1970's. Glasgow in Scotland demolished all the ghetto tenement blocks (outdoor toilets), and replaced them with around 1000 high-rise apartment blocks surrounded by farmland and gardens. It only took a few bored teenagers with mental health problems to completely devastate the area. They did things like elevator surfing (which broke them), jumping down the waste disposal chutes, burning rubbish in the surrounding gardens, playing loud music, holding extremely noisy parties, mugging other tenants in the hallways and breaking into an apartment when the owner was out working. Animals in the neighboring fields were teased and poisoned. They'd do everything from trying to see how many people could ride a horse at the same time to arranging dog fights.
Sometimes the builders themselves didn't construct the properties correctly. Tenants suffered problem with humidity, damp and mold because there was either continental windows (open air slats), or double-glazing and no ventilation. Neighbors also objected to the construction of high-rise apartment blocks because they lost the sunlight to their gardens as well as their privacy and security. Having a high-rise block also gave tenants a birds-eye view of which low-rise properties were vacant, so that encouraged squatters and burglaries.
In the end these properties had to be demolished and replaced with low-rise building. Some people are just not civilized enough to live in high-density units.
They have been living this way for centuries, untouched, quiet and at peace. They work hard and life isn't easy, but is it ever?
Our intelligence is a nice gift, but sadly we are trying to trick and play with a technology (nature) that is already perfect , this tech (nature) doesn't depend on humans, but we do. Perhaps, the idea in your post is different, I will not toss it in the bin yet, but I find it funny that we have a model already tried tested and true, arrogantly we are looking away.
bitsforbytes
reply to post by starheart
On the surface it looks like a nice idea.
I still think that the Amish have the best model, they depend as little as possible on technology. This habit can be seen as a weakness at first glance, however in reality it is their greatest asset. They move at the paste nature does. They understand that nature already is the best technology. They don't need a Large Hadron Collider to know who they are, they believe in God.
So far, what problems have they caused to the earth?
Do they fight for land?
Do they suffer from plagues?
Are they starving?
Do they need an army? Huge mega hospitals? A pharmaceutical industry? Waste management? Huge political campaigns costing the price of many hospital or wars that could put every citizen on the planet on a retirement plan?
Do they make items which pollute the planet?
If a CME hits earth and the power grids are down who will suffer the most ? Urban citizens or them?
The list goes on and on.
They have been living this way for centuries, untouched, quiet and at peace. They work hard and life isn't easy, but is it ever?
Our intelligence is a nice gift, but sadly we are trying to trick and play with a technology (nature) that is already perfect , this tech (nature) doesn't depend on humans, but we do. Perhaps, the idea in your post is different, I will not toss it in the bin yet, but I find it funny that we have a model already tried tested and true, arrogantly we are looking away.