It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Beijing-bound MAS plane carrying 239 people missing as of 20 mins ago.

page: 81
181
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 07:53 AM
link   

TheWednesday
www.thestar.com.my...


Very VERY Odd now.....

Sounds like a hijack....


Yea, and the Strait of Malacca only happens to be one of the worlds busiest shipping cannals, but no sighting.




posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 07:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Soloprotocol
 


That is what it is saying so now this opens more questioning, if the plane did indeed turn around as the military source was saying and change direction, why on earth did the Pilots not notify the control centre ??

Im absolutely baffled by this.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 07:59 AM
link   

ML8715
Apparently theres a website with the satellite images that you can look at to see if you see anything? Its not loading for me but could be because im on a tablet. If anyone else wants to try here it is

Link came from here
edit on 11-3-2014 by ML8715 because: (no reason given)


Not working for me either but I guess there are probably thousands of people logged into it trying to find the plane.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 07:59 AM
link   
reply to post by roadgravel
 


Sorry but I was thinking more along the lines of the aircraft being hijacked, landed then flown on to commit an atrocity . A nuke on a domestic flight over the ocean doesn't warrant the logistics that would have been involved . Unless there was a specific target ie Singapore or Hong Kong
edit on 11-3-2014 by da pickles because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by da pickles
 


Yeah im finding it all a little too odd, if there was an explosion mid air of some type would it not have been triggered on some of the mass of trackers the world has spying on everyone? satellites or what was mentioned earlier about NSPB (cant recall correct term lol) checking to detect explosion?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:08 AM
link   

Khaleesi

Bilk22

Khaleesi

Bilk22

Zaphod58
reply to post by Bilk22
 


So they had enough fuel to fly around Vietnam, dodging the Philippines, the ships that are patrolling the Spratly Islands, and up into China, with no one noticing them, even though they had planned to fly directly over Vietnam. It's not exactly like that added an extra hundred miles to the route. Fuel would have been a concern.
I guess I'll have to do the work of obtaining the distances. However it's clear you have not looked at a map as to where Beijing is in relation to the reported landing site. I'll see what I come up with


I'll also add, there's no reason to believe that if the scenario is as I suggested, they still could have taken the route over Vietnam escorted by Chinese military if the Vietnamese allowed that to happen. Just saying.


In order to do that you will need to know exactly where all radar sources were at the time the plane disappeared. That would include any military planes and ships that could have possibly detected the plane. This information would have been needed in order for anyone on board the plane to formulate a flight plan that would be undetected. You can not just subtract the distance of the supposed landing site (according to you) from the distance to Beijing. You will have to find a route that is undetected by radar, not necessarily a straight line route. I suspect this is what Zaphod has been trying to tell you.
You have to realize, no one was looking for the flight at the time so why would they have to circumvent any radar in international airspace? I drew a path that is clearly in international waters. The distance to the landing site is shorter than the trip to Beijing. Fuel wouldn't be an issue.


International waters? So what. International waters does not mean undetected by radar. I trust you verified that path made it impossible to detect by radar? I've seen you push this 'theory' throughout this thread. You've said things like "this is the best explanation" blah blah blah. No, this is your pet 'theory' that YOU insist on repeating although several people have pointed out the obvious flaws. Is this a mystery? Yes it is. Am I curious as to what happened? Yes, I am. Please understand I can do the 'conspiracy theory' dance with the best of them but, I prefer to stay in the realm of the plausible.
My theory is based on news reports that then went 404 or retracted. I posed a possibility based on those reports. What have you based yours on?

According to the resident radar expert here, primary radar would not have the ability to track once out of range. So what is that range? If you saw the map of the potential flight path I posted, then you would see the flight could have stayed over international waters all the way to mainland China. I also wonder who would have been tracking the flight other than Malaysian air controllers? Once over international waters, it's just another blob on primary radar with nothing to identify it. No one at that point in time would have reason to track it as who would know it would eventually disappear?

So what's your agenda in trying to debunk my theory? Doesn't cost anything and certainly doesn't harm anything - well unless there another agenda to be pushed.

Thanks for your insightful contribution.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:12 AM
link   
You can bet that US satellites would register a nuke blast.

Plane nuked in flight (Scratch)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:13 AM
link   

ML8715
Apparently theres a website with the satellite images that you can look at to see if you see anything? Its not loading for me but could be because im on a tablet. If anyone else wants to try here it is

Link came from here
edit on 11-3-2014 by ML8715 because: (no reason given)


I get "Could not open connection to database server" so maybe there is a problem with folks roaming around that area of the world and poking in areas they shouldn't? On the other hand, it may be swamped with people wanting to help look for the plane.

Perhaps we should be looking for remote flat areas of desert or at private airstrips in Iran to see if we can the missing Boeing 777-200ER aircraft bearing registration number 9M-MRO.

Looking more likely that it was hijacked or 'diverted' to the West of Malaysia after those military radar sightings at 29,500 ft.

Just thought I would post the details of the plane specs (seating, engines, dimensions, etc) again for anyone who is interested.
edit on 11 Mar 2014 by qmantoo because: repost url to plane spaces



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:14 AM
link   
This confuses me.

From the Daily Mail page about the story.

www.dailymail.co.uk... es-active.html



Why do they both have exactly the same legs?

If they've just overlaid the one on the left over the one on the right, why try to line up the bag which is what it looks like? Unless it's been done by someone with a nice tidy mind.
edit on k081603bamTue, 11 Mar 2014 08:16:43 -0500 by khimbar because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:15 AM
link   
Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. Famous quote and very true



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:17 AM
link   
reply to post by khimbar
 


They don't.

The photo on the left has the photo from the right's lower half, perhaps as a try it and see style montage?
edit on 11-3-2014 by theabsolutetruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:18 AM
link   

khimbar


Why do they both have exactly the same legs?



They have the wrong foreheads.

You can often ID someone based on their forehead. And, as other poster pointed out, the leg is a copy/pasted picture.


edit on 11-3-2014 by swanne because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:20 AM
link   

khimbar
This confuses me.

From the Daily Mail page about the story.

www.dailymail.co.uk... es-active.html



Why do they both have exactly the same legs?

If they've just overlaid the one on the left over the one on the right, why try to line up the bag which is what it looks like? Unless it's been done by someone with a nice tidy mind.
edit on k081603bamTue, 11 Mar 2014 08:16:43 -0500 by khimbar because: (no reason given)


Good catch. The photo on the left is very obviously doctored.

Maybe the press is being manipulated by someone trying to cover up the identity of the Iranians...



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:21 AM
link   

khimbar
This confuses me.

From the Daily Mail page about the story.

www.dailymail.co.uk... es-active.html



Why do they both have exactly the same legs?


It's ok...The Daily Hiel confuses everyone.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:22 AM
link   
reply to post by khimbar
 


Looks like the same bag also. Good catch! This story gets more confusing as each day goes by.....I feel bad for the families waiting for news, just seen a news clip of them throwing water bottles at the officials....poor people. Sure hope they find this plane sooner then later, along with the missing people.....



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:30 AM
link   
IMO, I don't think the paste up was meant to fool people into thinking it was an actual full body picture. They just were trying to get something similar in arrangement for both pictures.

I could be wrong but no one creating it or looking at it is that gullible, are they?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:44 AM
link   
Really dumb question I know nothing about planes or radars and tracking but, on the flight aware data for MH370 it lists the tracker as below:

21:02 4.7073 102.5278 25° Northeast 468 539 35,000 Level FlightAware ADS-B (WMKP / PEN)

WKMP / PEN is Penang Airport if the plane was heading to Beijing isn't that a bit far away to be picking up the planes location or is it normal?

Sorry as I said probably dumb question?

I checked same flight on 10th and a lot of the columns appear different, I guess it depends on small diversions planes may take due to turbulence etc?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:46 AM
link   

roadgravel
IMO, I don't think the paste up was meant to fool people into thinking it was an actual full body picture. They just were trying to get something similar in arrangement for both pictures.

I could be wrong but no one creating it or looking at it is that gullible, are they?


I don't think they're that stupid. I'm not suggesting that.

Just think it's interesting.



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:50 AM
link   
Question. If their mobile phones are still active, can't they triangulate their position via satellite?



posted on Mar, 11 2014 @ 08:55 AM
link   

civpop
Really dumb question I know nothing about planes or radars and tracking but, on the flight aware data for MH370 it lists the tracker as below:

21:02 4.7073 102.5278 25° Northeast 468 539 35,000 Level FlightAware ADS-B (WMKP / PEN)

WKMP / PEN is Penang Airport if the plane was heading to Beijing isn't that a bit far away to be picking up the planes location or is it normal?

Sorry as I said probably dumb question?

I checked same flight on 10th and a lot of the columns appear different, I guess it depends on small diversions planes may take due to turbulence etc?


That position seems to be along the course the plane would take as it left flying the same course as the missing flight. The data is most likely from another flight.



new topics

top topics



 
181
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join