It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
sy.gunson
Yes the whole world is having a big old chuckle about the tin foil hat crazies at ATS who can invent a conspiracy out of any newspaper article faster than they can fold the same article into a work of Origami.
Tons of mindless speculation is being spawned here with absolutely no relationship to the facts.
sy.gunson
reply to post by roadgravel
So you are saying the aircraft flew low over the Maldives an hour after fuel was exhausted and more than an hour after the last satellite ping ?
...Bearing in mind that a Boeing 777's maximum permitted speed below 10,000ft is 250 knots and maximum possible speed is 280knots with about ten times the fuel consumption at 35,000ft.
If it flew across the Indian Ocean at low altitude it would not make it half way to Sri Lanka.
I did read it, but I don't think you understand what it says.
sy.gunson
Arbitrageur
That link says "Controller–pilot data link communications", not "Classic Aero is an ACARS based system". I think you're confused.
sy.gunson
Classic Aero is an ACARS based system
Why don't you actually read the link I provided before rushing to refute it?
I already quoted from that link but let me do it again... This time bother to read it:
It was originally deployed in the South Pacific in the late 1990s and was later extended to the North Atlantic. FANS-1/A is an ACARS based service and, given its oceanic use, mainly uses satellite communications provided by the Inmarsat Data-2 (Classic Aero) service.
Of course not because the engine leasing agreement did not require transmission of data after take off and climb to altitude.
You are flogging a dead horse
It had a subscription to use ACARS for 30 minutes after engine start. Thereafter engines made a handshake connection through ACARS every 30 minutes or so.
I've heard that a satellite detected MH370 after the plane went dark. If the flight's communications were down, what was talking to the satellite?
The short answer? ACARS.
But you said ACARS had been disabled.
ACARS was disabled. But the satellite equipment it uses hadn't been. It had been responding to "pings" from a satellite that, at a minimum, tells investigators the plane was still up and running. Others have called this activity a digital "handshake."
"You have to see these two things at two different layers," said David Cenciotti, an aviation writer based in Rome. "At the higher one you have ACARS with all the series of messages that can be exchanged between the plane and the receiving station on VHF, HF or SATCOM. At the lower layer you have the network that is used to deliver these messages: pings are used to check the status of the underlying network."
No information gets exchanged in a ping -- it's simply a way for one entity to make sure that the other is there.
auroraaus
The CVR continued to record after landing and subsequently all relevant information needed on it wiped.
No information gets exchanged in a ping -- it's simply a way for one entity to make sure that the other is there.
Flight 370's pilot, Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, was the last person on the jet to speak to air-traffic controllers, telling them "Good night, Malaysian three-seven-zero," Malaysian sources told CNN.
The sources said there was nothing unusual about his voice, which betrayed no indication that he was under stress. One of the sources, an official involved in the investigation, told CNN that police played the recording to five other Malaysia Airlines pilots who knew the pilot and co-pilot. "There were no third-party voices," the source said.
CNN
it's pretty clear you don't understand technical stuff. Some of that stuff you quoted is basically what I have been saying.
This is as bad as the person who could not understand how to convert between UTC and local time.
Looks like facts are pretty much frowned upon here.
You are the one pointing fingers at me....
You also have to option to research and learn about this technology.
CharlieSpeirs
you have the option to complain to the Washington Post if you don't like their expert analysis!!!
If somebody had turned ACARS off, why didn't the pings stop then as well?
Disabling the transmission of engine performance data and other information may be as simple as flipping a switch. But to stop the pings from occurring, you'd have to dig around in the guts of the plane itself, said one ACARS expert who asked for anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak to the public.
"The antenna is on top of the aircraft, so it can't be reached," the expert said. "And secondly — think of it like a fuse box. The fuse box for the power — to disable that you'd have to open up the floor, go down and find the correct switches and cables and disable that. For a lot of pilots, they don't even know that that's there."
Does roadgravel also have the option to complain about how you misrepresented the Washington Post's article? Because the only part of that article that was coming from an anonymous expert, is the part you actually failed to quote.
CharlieSpeirs
Like I said already... It's not my opinion!!!
It's the anonymous "expert" who spoke to Washington Post!!!
See I was agreeing with the experts opinion that the technology was still working, therefore interferable IMO!!!
Also my point that the ping & handshake are the same thing is proven within the article!!!
Not that the expert said every word of the article!!!