It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
~Lucidity
reply to post by Mikeultra
Yep I sure do.
(And believe it or not, said it before he did, when I was a kid.)
And here's another angle. Suppose we've had contact all along and suppose nuclear annihilation (Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Iran) was perceived by our alien brethren to be imminent (UFO over Ukraine...UFO over area where plane disappeared) and this is a tactic.
reply to post by xavi1000
Not if they're cloaked.
edit on 3/13/2014 by ~Lucidity because: (no reason given)
Did the patent thing actually happen or is this conjecture?
hardwarexpert
80% of the patent holders die on that plane.
Freescale Semiconductor now becomes sole patent owner of chip/wafer tech.
Blackstone holds major shares in FS- Jake Rothschild is advising member of Blackstone.
Four days after the flight goes missing, this patent is approved by the Patent Office for maximizing dies on a wafer. Coincidence?
Bilk22
Did the patent thing actually happen or is this conjecture?
hardwarexpert
80% of the patent holders die on that plane.
Freescale Semiconductor now becomes sole patent owner of chip/wafer tech.
Blackstone holds major shares in FS- Jake Rothschild is advising member of Blackstone.
Four days after the flight goes missing, this patent is approved by the Patent Office for maximizing dies on a wafer. Coincidence?
As the search expands to include the Indian Ocean, Malaysian authorities and the airline itself have continued to deny reports the missing plane had transmitted technical data.
Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, the chief executive of Malaysia Airlines, said in a recent press conference that technical data received less than half an hour after takeoff - and which indicated no problems with the aircraft - was the last transmission.
The report that Rolls-Royce had received data transmissions from the engines several hours after takeoff has also been disputed by Malaysias’ defence minister who said it was “inaccurate.”
Brocade
ManiShuck
(which I guess could be a reason FBI and such has been so quiet and downplaying terrorism?)
I really liked your post, except for this - downplaying terrorism?? The US has been relentlessly trying to claim this is a terrorist incident, presumably because they think they can exploit the generated fear to 'justify' even more surveillance and human rights abuses. No matter what actually happened to this plane, it will always be used by them as an example of the horrors of terrorism.edit on 062Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:29:56 -050020142014-03-13T19:29:56-05:00pm13America/Chicago by Brocade because: (no reason given)edit on 062Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:30:40 -050020142014-03-13T19:30:40-05:00pm13America/Chicago by Brocade because: typos
hardwarexpert
reply to post by theabsolutetruth
Jacob Rothschild
Freescales patent March 11th 2014
Freescales shares info
For some reason the links I'm posting are showing as having _____ before the URL when I preview my post.
Not sure if this is because I haven't posted much or if its a forum glitch?
Interesting information, but intellectual property is like any other property. Next of kin would have rights to it.
rockflier
Bilk22
Did the patent thing actually happen or is this conjecture?
hardwarexpert
80% of the patent holders die on that plane.
Freescale Semiconductor now becomes sole patent owner of chip/wafer tech.
Blackstone holds major shares in FS- Jake Rothschild is advising member of Blackstone.
Four days after the flight goes missing, this patent is approved by the Patent Office for maximizing dies on a wafer. Coincidence?
The link that was posted takes you to the actual patent issue. Yes it is true.
Well the issue here is, the four are not legally deceased yet. Not sure how that plays out in a court, but Rothschild would certainly know how to fight it and obviously has the money to do so. However even if they were the patent holders, that doesn't tell us anything about royalties. Plenty of engineers that work for all sorts of firms are patent holders, but do not receive the royalties. They are employees and are compensated as employees not partners.
hardwarexpert
So to summarize all my posts:
4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of
Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.
Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders.
Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Freescale Semiconductor (20%)
If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders
equally share the dividends of the deceased if not
disputed in a will.
If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder
gets 100% of the wealth of the patent.
That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.
Who owns Freescale Semiconductor ??
Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone who owns Freescale.
Here is your motive for the missing Beijing plane.
As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were
passengers on the missing plane.
Patent holders can alter the proceeds legally by
passing wealth to their heirs. However, they cannot
do so until the Patent is approved. So when the plane
went missing, the patent had not been approved.
Thus, Rothschild gets 100% of Patent once Patent
holders declared deceased.
ManiShuck
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Well said.
And this was the newest update on the Guardian's site, reiterating that the RR data was false.
As the search expands to include the Indian Ocean, Malaysian authorities and the airline itself have continued to deny reports the missing plane had transmitted technical data.
Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, the chief executive of Malaysia Airlines, said in a recent press conference that technical data received less than half an hour after takeoff - and which indicated no problems with the aircraft - was the last transmission.
The report that Rolls-Royce had received data transmissions from the engines several hours after takeoff has also been disputed by Malaysias’ defence minister who said it was “inaccurate.”
Brocade
ManiShuck
(which I guess could be a reason FBI and such has been so quiet and downplaying terrorism?)
I really liked your post, except for this - downplaying terrorism?? The US has been relentlessly trying to claim this is a terrorist incident, presumably because they think they can exploit the generated fear to 'justify' even more surveillance and human rights abuses. No matter what actually happened to this plane, it will always be used by them as an example of the horrors of terrorism.edit on 062Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:29:56 -050020142014-03-13T19:29:56-05:00pm13America/Chicago by Brocade because: (no reason given)edit on 062Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:30:40 -050020142014-03-13T19:30:40-05:00pm13America/Chicago by Brocade because: typos
I said it because, at the time, I was finding articles where they were saying they didn't believe it was a terrorist act and that the Iranians had no ties to terrorism. They also mentioned the lack of significant chatter in the terrorism communities about the event. The introduction of what appears to be false RR engine data is what seems to have sparked the terrorism story.
Their interest in the disappearance has risen, and that statement I made probably no longer applies. I can definitely agree with you that they would like to use this as a reason to increase security and surveillance, no matter what the outcome.