It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
thebulletin.org...
But what are the U.S. interests and what exactly does this sovereignty debate have to do with Africa's nuclear-weapon-free zone? In the last 40 or so years, thanks to a series of U.S.-British bilateral agreements (some of them secret), the expulsion of the atoll's indigenous population between 1967 and 1973, and a $2.5 billion U.S. military construction program, Diego Garcia has developed into a robust naval support facility, satellite tracking station, and bomber forward-operating location. It played a central role in all offensive combat missions against Iraq and Afghanistan from 1991 to 2006 and was used as a staging area for 20 B-52 bombers prominently deployed as a "calculated-ambiguous" tactical nuclear deterrent against any possible chemical or biological weapons used by Iraq against U.S. forces. The Diego Garcia internal lagoon--a gigantic natural harbor, measuring 48 square miles and dredged to a depth of 40 feet as a turning basin for aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines--is currently being upgraded to accommodate the U.S. Navy's new nuclear-powered, guided missile attack submarines. Considering the base's strategic location, current U.S. needs in the Middle East and Central Asia, and what is known about past uses of the base, it would be irresponsible to rule out the potential for nuclear weapons at Diego Garcia.
Mikeultra
This article leaves no doubt that there are nukes on Diego Garcia.
thebulletin.org...
But what are the U.S. interests and what exactly does this sovereignty debate have to do with Africa's nuclear-weapon-free zone? In the last 40 or so years, thanks to a series of U.S.-British bilateral agreements (some of them secret), the expulsion of the atoll's indigenous population between 1967 and 1973, and a $2.5 billion U.S. military construction program, Diego Garcia has developed into a robust naval support facility, satellite tracking station, and bomber forward-operating location. It played a central role in all offensive combat missions against Iraq and Afghanistan from 1991 to 2006 and was used as a staging area for 20 B-52 bombers prominently deployed as a "calculated-ambiguous" tactical nuclear deterrent against any possible chemical or biological weapons used by Iraq against U.S. forces. The Diego Garcia internal lagoon--a gigantic natural harbor, measuring 48 square miles and dredged to a depth of 40 feet as a turning basin for aircraft carriers and nuclear submarines--is currently being upgraded to accommodate the U.S. Navy's new nuclear-powered, guided missile attack submarines. Considering the base's strategic location, current U.S. needs in the Middle East and Central Asia, and what is known about past uses of the base, it would be irresponsible to rule out the potential for nuclear weapons at Diego Garcia.
The Google Earth image below shows construction on the roof of a hangar on Diego Garcia. It is the latest image although there is no date on it. Maybe MH370 was taken here?
This image was taken on 10/27/2003 and shows the roof already built.
Jennyfrenzy
reply to post by Realtruth
Unfortunately it's not mh370. China stated they released those images by mistake.
They continue to feed to world a bunch of bs.
Link
Satellite images released by 'mistake' On the Chinese satellite images, Hussein confirmed that planes had been dispatched to examine the area concerned. “We deployed our assets but found nothing,” he said. We contacted the Chinese embassy who notified us that the images were released by mistake and did not show any debris from MH370.
edit on 13-3-2014 by Jennyfrenzy because: (no reason given)
MRuss
I'm curious why the US would allow the Malaysians to search in the wrong place for several days. Seems like the US would have at least nudged them in the right direction a bit sooner if they had the intelligence.
OpinionatedB
reply to post by Seek_Truth
Right now everyone seems to be re-tweeting that but there is no full story on it anywhere. Not Reuters not any other news outlet that has said this in the last hour or two...
Until they say anything more, like who is saying this what satellites and so forth it pretty much seems like BS.
OpinionatedB
reply to post by Seek_Truth
Right now everyone seems to be re-tweeting that but there is no full story on it anywhere. Not Reuters not any other news outlet that has said this in the last hour or two...
Until they say anything more, like who is saying this what satellites and so forth it pretty much seems like BS.
OpinionatedB
reply to post by Seek_Truth
Right now everyone seems to be re-tweeting that but there is no full story on it anywhere. Not Reuters not any other news outlet that has said this in the last hour or two...
Until they say anything more, like who is saying this what satellites and so forth it pretty much seems like BS.