posted on May, 12 2014 @ 11:59 AM
originally posted by: imitator
I think your underestimating modern RAM technology, it's much more advanced than it was several years ago. ATC looks for skin paint, plus
transponders... They do test 40+ year old aircraft with stealth technology, several countries still use old aircraft that can be modified with modern
RAM. The do test F4's and other aircraft with such material against missiles and radar etc...
I'm probably the LAST person on here that underestimates RAM technology. But putting RAM on an F-4 is like putting lipstick on a pig. It's only
going to get you so far. The underlying design is not stealthy, and has no stealthy characteristics. A RAM coating will get you SOME reduction in
RCS, but it won't get you anywhere even remotely close to a modern stealth aircraft, and it won't get you invisible to ATC radar, especially at the
range they were from the antenna. The closer you are to an antenna the better your stealth has to be, and they were only at 2300 feet descending
towards the airport.
I'm not saying only F4's are reserved for false flag scenarios, it can be any type of aircraft that can be droned out for such events. It's
common sense for most conspiracy theories... right? The fact is, it can be done.
Except for the fact that all the aircraft that are available to them are aircraft our allies use, so if there was a false flag using a QF conversion,
it would implicate our allies, or stand out immediately that it was a false flag.
A split second view can give a false sense of size and color, visual memory is incredibly small... that is why eyewitness evidence can be
useless in a court of law. The fact that he saw an F4 near an area that test F4's is what stands out...
So I guess that means that RC planes should be outlawed. Because there are types for every type of fighter out there. Again, if this was a full size
F-4, there would be NO mistaking it for an RC plane if it was so close that the pilot was convinced he hit it, quick glimpse or not. It would have
filled the windscreen of that plane. The USAIr plane was a CRJ-200. The CRJ-200 is 87 feet long, with a 69 foot wingspan. It's not much bigger
than the F-4 that you say was involved. Even a quick glimpse is going to absolutely fill the windscreen of a CRJ, and could never be mistaken for
Plus the FAA digging out files to fit their agenda.... it seems nowadays they have a bunch of idiots running government agencies...
This is probably the only part that we agree on.