It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There may, of course, be some technical reason that this could not work.
C-JEAN
Hi, Ross.
There may, of course, be some technical reason that this could not work.
One I see is: movements !!
BUT, I guess we have to consider that:
we turn around the earth's surface,
earth turns around the sun,
sun turns around the galaxy. . .
Soooooooo, ALL is moving relatively to each other.
It is surely impossible to use our sun to aim another sun,
with all those movements. . .? Right ?
Even if we go to the distance of the focal point also,
the 2 suns WILL be moving relatively to the focal point !
Sooooooooo, impossible to make a long & stable signal. . .?
Blue skies.
With these relays in place, the error rate between the two points would drop from 1-in-2 to 1-in-2 million – on par with the accuracy achieved by the DSN in our local solar environment.
Shockingly little transmitting power is needed, too: just one-tenth of a milliwatt, or several orders of magnitude less than the DSN's antennas, Maccone found.
Maccone also gauged the focal points and transmission strengths for two other nearby stars: Barnard's star, a small red dwarf, and Sirius, a blue giant, which are located 5.6 and 8.6 light-years from Earth, respectively.
i have not found it yet but i will continue to look: i read a article on an interstellar mission that used gravity lensing to bring down the size and power requirements of the probe's transmitter and size of its transmitter dish. that article said that there is a semi stable lagrange like point near the natural lens position so a relay satthere would need far less propellant for station keeping which could be achieved with ion propulsion, solar sails, or an M2P2 engine. when i find it i'll try to post it.
Ross 54
It was my hope that this idea could be tried out from Earth's surface. This would, of course, simplify certain matters a great deal. Perhaps using a series of radio telescopes could offset the problem of Earth's rotation causing the viewpoint to shift, as mentioned above. I suspect there is some other technical problem with applying this idea, and that it has been considered and discarded as unworkable by far wiser heads than mine.