God, yay or nay?

reply to post by BuzzyWigs


It's ok, I don't believe in holding signs saying "your going to hell" bit people like Paul Washer who preach righteousness, those are the children of YAHUWAH and they follow YAHUSHUA. To tell a woman to be modest and that your chlothes should frame your face, not your body, is not wrong.

BuzzyWigs
reply to post by stok3th3fir3

 

but you don't believe in the YAHUWAH, so don't worry about it.

You still didn't answer the question, though...

So non-believers needn't worry; correct?
Yet believers should? ( No, non-believers should worry unless nothingness is what they seek, like athiests believe happens when you die, however the judgement will be quite a suprise, for that happens before the second death.)

Seems to me that relieving oneself of 'worry' is a worthy goal.
I asked if your fear inhibited your ability to enjoy being alive now.
'Worry' is a dreadful thing, and doesn't change anything at all.

IMUO.

reply to post by stok3th3fir3


What is there to fear if you follow he who made you? The only fear is that of losing him.

AfterInfinity
reply to post by randyvs

 

It's great to see you're playing fair.

I'm really very interested in providing an accurate consensus for
everyone that might have an interest including myself. And don't
believe for one second that the outcome proves or means one
damn thing really. What could it prove? And why would I not,
"Play fair"? Or was that just an insult and I'm daffed for answering
you?

reply to post by randyvs


Yay!

I do believe a system exists that encompasses anything imaginable by humans, including divinity. The way I choose to live my life would be the same regardless though. I am a bigger fan of appreciation and constant mindfulness than I am of sporadic praise and worship.

reply to post by randyvs


Why would it be an insult?

reply to post by AfterInfinity

Why would it be an insult?

Well it is really if you think about it and it's always hard to tell with you AI.
Suggesting that I might employ my talent for deviousness over anything so
frivalous as this? Palease!

reply to post by randyvs

I'm really very interested in providing an accurate consensus for
everyone that might have an interest including myself. And don't
believe for one second that the outcome proves or means one
damn thing really. What could it prove?

I'm also interested in the tally but of course it's merely a snapshot of what who happened to be paying attention thought at the time

Right - the outcome doesn't mean a damned thing.

But - it's a fun/interesting thread anyway.

reply to post by stok3th3fir3

To tell a woman to be modest and that your chlothes should frame your face, not your body, is not wrong.

What? Their clothes should frame their face and not their body?

I think I'm in over my head here

reply to post by BuzzyWigs

But - it's a fun/interesting thread anyway.

Very nice of you to say. Can't believe how well behaved everyone
is being. Nockety wood nockety.

reply to post by randyvs


I am interested in the outcome just out of curiosity.

I suggest adding a category for those who say Yay-However..yada yada

reply to post by Grimpachi


Don't you want more definition in the tuning less distortion?
Can't please everyone Grim, but I did give it some thought.
We seem to be losing interest any ways.

reply to post by Grimpachi


As he said before, its not Baskin Robbins (sp?). Does your dog look exactly the way you want it to? Do trees grow up in exactly the shape you want ands give you exactly as much fruit in whatever color you want? This universe isn't here for our convenience, so what gives with the custom order? I've always found it funny that everyone's god always thinks exactly like they do. "Yay BUT..." just confuses things. Its a simple question with a simple answer.

reply to post by AfterInfinity

Its a simple question with a simple answer.

Well said.

reply to post by AfterInfinity

"Yay BUT..." just confuses things. Its a simple question with a simple answer.

There are too many definitions of "God" for it to be that simple, I think.

The "Yay, but" people (myself included) probably represent agnostics who don't buy in to the program(s) as packaged.

So - maybe randy could tally how many "yes buts" are here as well??

Could be illuminating as to the audience here....
Or, if he's lost interest, I could do it.

If anyone really even cares.



Or not.

reply to post by randyvs


My bad I thought you said you were not counting the ones who said Yay: however.

So I guess you are counting them. In that case I would have thought there was a lot more Yays than there are. A whole lot more than what there are.

Edit

I guess I should have just counted myself instead of asking. For anyone that is interested I counted 13 who said Yay: However...yada yada.

reply to post by Grimpachi

My bad I thought you said you were not counting the ones who said Yay: however.

Yes, that is a negative. The only posts I wasn't counting are the ones that
you see both a yay and a nay. For obvious reasons only. If a post only says
yay, it was counted dispite any ensuing aspirations or explanations.

But no else is allowed to count, only me.

Oh wow. I quit on page 1. Sorry, everyone....I did start to do, and had four "yay/nays" . Then I apparently lost interest.


I guess??

Grimpachi

My bad I thought you said you were not counting the ones who said Yay: however.

Randyvs: Yes, that is a negative. The only posts I wasn't counting are the ones that
you see both a yay and a nay. For obvious reasons only. If a post only says
yay, it was counted dispite any ensuing aspirations or explanations.

But no else is allowed to count, only me.

DIsCrimInATion!!!!



Ugh....multiple edits for formatting. Sri.

reply to post by BuzzyWigs


Weird I counted a total of 24 Yay and counted 13 Yay with stipulations that should be 11 Yahways. Sorry Randy I can't help it if I already counted.

The Nays here are a lot higher percentage than is what is actually reported in society polls. I did figure the Nays would be a minority here like in life.