Japan Repeats: Japan ready to strike first if threatened: PM, page
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-5-2003 @ 08:47 AM by deepwaters
Butting in does not apply here Abe, as South Korea is a U.S. ally and under direct threat from North Korea.

Nuclear power carries the unspoken threat of total annihilation and any sane nation would not want to press that boundary for fear of the consequences. I would suggest that with military might and nuclear capability; come the responsibility not to abuse it by starting wars and killing possibly millions of people. If America wanted to bully other nations with the threat of nuclear weapons, it could do so – but it doesn’t. Why? Because America realises the horrors of a nuclear holocaust and only maintains its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent against foreign aggressors. America knows that it has the edge and uses political and economic pressure to manipulate other nations and get what it wants.

Sure that means that America carries the biggest stick on the block – but someone has to, why not the U.S.? The old saying goes, “might is right”. Meaning that the U.S. and her allies do enjoy an imbalance of power in the world today – but that’s just the way it is. Should the U.S. say, “OK everybody, we’ve decided that it’s unfair for us to have so much power, so we’re going to share it equally with all of you”. It’s natural for America to want to remain the dominant world power – hey, being in control of the world “feels good”. That’s human nature and just the way things are at present.

Personally, I’m glad that America has the edge and hope things remain like that for a long time to come. I’d hate to think about some of the fanatical third world countries ever getting possession of nuclear weapons. With their rigid beliefs and centuries old hatreds and traditions – there might not be much of a planet for anyone to enjoy, let alone control, if they did have this technology.


reply posted on 25-5-2003 @ 07:17 AM by deepwaters
Yes, Israel most certainly possesses some level of nuclear capability. America has allowed Israel to continue their defence programs because (I believe) it suits American interests in that region. And that certainly looks hypocritical - apparently; it’s always benefited U.S. foreign policy to have pro-American Israel as an ally in the Middle East. Allowing Israel to possess WMD while surrounded by enemy states has been volatile move by America, but probably served to keep the Arabs in check. Geo-politics can be very risky business and America foreign policy planners have made some very poor decisions in the past. Trying to manage world affairs seems an almost impossible task and carries the potential to backfire. But Israel has been America’s ally since its inception, and Israel doesn’t make demands and threaten to launch an attack if they’re not given what they want (as Mr. Kim has done). Israel did threaten to launch nuclear weapons against Iraq recently, but only if Iraq launched weapons against them first. At the end of the day, Israel remained on the side lines and allowed the U.S. led coalition to deal with the Iraqi regime.

I realise that should the Palestinian situation escalate to the point that Israel lost reason and launched whatever WMD it has, it would be a disaster. Unfortunately, that may be beyond America’s ability to control and in hindsight, a very poor choice. I do become a bit disillusioned when I read reports about U.S. political planners making poor choices based on incorrect information or grandiose assumptions. I hope Israel’s possession of WMD won’t backfire and bring about a nuclear holocaust. Consider the following statements by Israelis, related information and links.

Ariel Sharon: "Arabs may have the oil, but we have the matches."

Seymour Hersh: Should war break out in the Middle East again, or should any Arab nation fire missiles against Israel, as the Iraqis did, a nuclear escalation, once unthinkable except as a last resort, would now be a strong probability."

General Saguy fully shares the notion of a threat to Israel's very survival: `Syria has always been and still is a threat to the security and very survival of the State of Israel', the reason being that `Syria continues to arm itself.' This statement is documented by a long list of Syrian weaponry purchases without mentioning Israeli ones.

Israeli nuclear development information:
Israel began its search for nuclear weapons at the inception of the state in 1948. As payment for Israeli participation in the Suez Crisis of 1956, France provided nuclear expertise and constructed a reactor complex for Israel at Dimona capable of large-scale plutonium production and reprocessing. Israel is believed to possess the largest and most sophisticated arsenal outside of the five declared nuclear powers. Israel has never admitted possessing nuclear weapons, but abundant information is available showing that the capability exists. The centre of Israel's weapons program is the Negev Nuclear Research Centre near the desert town of Dimona (the centre is usually identified simply as "Dimona"). A nuclear reactor and plutonium production facility was built by France at this facility in the late 1950s and early 60s. All of the production and fabrication of special nuclear materials (plutonium, lithium-6 deuteride, and enriched and unenriched uranium) occurs at Dimona although the design and assembly of nuclear weapons occurs elsewhere.
August 18, 2000: New satellite pictures of Israel's nuclear reactor were published on the front page of an Israeli mass-circulation newspaper Friday, a sign that Israel's nuclear weapons capability is being discussed here with increasing openness after decades of silence.

UN Report: Two of the most sensitive questions in the world of nuclear arms control - what do the nuclear powers need to do to convince the rest of the world they are serious about nuclear disarmament and what should be done about Israel's not-so-secret nuclear weapons program - have now taken centre-stage at the Review Conference for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The transformation of the Middle East into a zone free of WMD - nuclear, chemical and biological - including delivery vehicles is highlighted as the best option to put an end to the threats of all these weapons, to ban all missile defense systems and to prevent US counter proliferation strategies and its policies against the so-called rogue states. Finally, the political conditions to implement the alternatives are briefly examined. Among them are the necessity of socio-economic and human development as the assured base to secure national security; the elimination of the root causes of conflicts to be pursued instead of conflict management, the transformation of civil society into human society, and other appropriate conditions which ensure the implementation of the alternatives.

Israeli Weapons of Mass Destruction

Israel may have 200 nuclear weapons

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons

Israeli Nuclear Weapons Links

Israel Military Industries Ltd.

Israel’s Nuclear Weapons

Israeli Technology

The US-Israeli Connection

Israel Readies Tactical Nuclear Weapons

CNN Report

Israeli Nuclear and Foreign Policies

Conference Focuses on Global Disarmament: Israeli Nuclear Weapons-
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Iraq War Ruined My Life.
  Posted 19 days ago with 80 member flags
Alert: Possible Terror-related activity in NW Ohio
  Posted 6 days ago with 45 member flags
False Flag! CIA Thwarts Another Al-Qaida Underwear Bomb Plot
  Posted 16 days ago with 18 member flags
\'Bin Laden died of natural causes\'
  Posted 4 days ago with 17 member flags