reply to post by soulpowertothendegree
he has credentials where planes are concerned and, yet, he claims no planes hit the towers. none. zero. not an airplane. search the site and
you'll find a nice conversation I had with him where he tries to convince me that I don't know what an airplane in the sky looks like.
there are 2 possible explanations for the people who push the no plane theory.
1. they are paid to talk about a 9/11 conspiracy that is so ludicrous and idiotic that it results in all 9/11 researchers being lumped into a giant
2. they're certifiably insane.
I tend to think they're all part of option 1. The sad truth is that planes did hit the towers. the towers did collapse and a whole lot of people
What has never been answered is how the hell the plot happened. with all our supposed intel, we failed to stop it and, even as it was happening, how
did we sit idle for as long as we did, allowing 3 of the 4 planes to hit their mark?
here's your magic trick, to use your own description:
The no plane theory, the bombs in the building theory, all the lunacy that is centered around the twin towers, is what magicians will call a
while you sit and stare at the left hand, the right hand is slipping the card under the table.
in this case, the no planes crowd are hell bent on proving the dumbest possible theory about that day that has ever been conjured, all the while
ignoring the more important things like "did we shoot down that 4th plane" (I believe we did) and "who dropped the ball and allowed this all to even
so, whilst you sit and gaze at the sleight of hand that Mr. Lear is playing for you, those of us who know there were planes, who saw them, will
continue to dig into the real mysteries of that day.
edit on 3-3-2014 by Crakeur because: (no reason given)