It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia declares war on Ukraine. Live updates from inside Ukraine

page: 121
367
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 10:03 PM
link   

pheonix358

TritonTaranis

pheonix358

xavi1000
The best way to handle an angry person like Putin is to simply turn on him and walk away, refusing to listen to his ranting. Words are not the solution to the nutty things a man says; firm, quiet, reasoned-out actions are. Reacting in anger to an angry person doesn't work. Watchful waiting and firmness do. If Western leaders act quietly, firmly and without wavering, this situation can be frozen at the point it is now and kept from spreading further. Now is the time to decide how to handle this , not when his next grab for power takes place. Putin has revealed his paranoia. When dealing with a paranoid person, one must 'talk him down' carefully, but always know he is essentially a loose cannon -- and always will be.


Putin is not the loose cannon here. You may like to look closer to home to find your loose cannon, in fact lots and lots of loose cannons. Start with the big white house in DC and spread out from there. McCain is a loose cannon, rusty too.

P


Yeah you're absolutely right.. Putin isn't a loose cannon here at all the world is on drugs and a bunch of liars



Thank you and I agree with you 100% on this single post of yours.

Putin is not a loose cannon.

The world is on drugs, yep, although you may put the US on top of that list, they have more people in jail for drugs than anyon else.

Bunch of liars, I assume you are talking of politicians and the media they own or control. Yes I agree although it is a bit like stating the bleeding obvious now, isn't it.

Never never thought I would see the day that we would agree on something. I am impressed!

P


Seems you're stereotyping and taring all with one brush to back up your claims continuously

Deny ignorance my friend

Ok to sum it up

Putin isn't a loose cannon...the rest of the civilised worlds leaders are

Because they're all on drugs which makes them lie often

In the words of dr evil... Rightttttttttttttttttttt




posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 10:29 PM
link   

schmae
www.nytimes.com...

The prime minister of Crimea, the autonomous Ukrainian republic seized by Russian military forces, said Tuesday that most Ukrainian military units on the Crimean Peninsula had surrendered and pledged allegiance to his pro-Russian government



This is a very old trick get people to surrender by making them think others have just one more lie in the propaganda war.



posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 10:35 PM
link   

TritonTaranis

pheonix358

TritonTaranis

pheonix358

xavi1000
The best way to handle an angry person like Putin is to simply turn on him and walk away, refusing to listen to his ranting. Words are not the solution to the nutty things a man says; firm, quiet, reasoned-out actions are. Reacting in anger to an angry person doesn't work. Watchful waiting and firmness do. If Western leaders act quietly, firmly and without wavering, this situation can be frozen at the point it is now and kept from spreading further. Now is the time to decide how to handle this , not when his next grab for power takes place. Putin has revealed his paranoia. When dealing with a paranoid person, one must 'talk him down' carefully, but always know he is essentially a loose cannon -- and always will be.


Putin is not the loose cannon here. You may like to look closer to home to find your loose cannon, in fact lots and lots of loose cannons. Start with the big white house in DC and spread out from there. McCain is a loose cannon, rusty too.

P


Yeah you're absolutely right.. Putin isn't a loose cannon here at all the world is on drugs and a bunch of liars



Thank you and I agree with you 100% on this single post of yours.

Putin is not a loose cannon.

The world is on drugs, yep, although you may put the US on top of that list, they have more people in jail for drugs than anyon else.

Bunch of liars, I assume you are talking of politicians and the media they own or control. Yes I agree although it is a bit like stating the bleeding obvious now, isn't it.

Never never thought I would see the day that we would agree on something. I am impressed!

P


Seems you're stereotyping and taring all with one brush to back up your claims continuously

Deny ignorance my friend

Ok to sum it up

Putin isn't a loose cannon...the rest of the civilised worlds leaders are

Because they're all on drugs which makes them lie often

In the words of dr evil... Rightttttttttttttttttttt





Sounds like something someone says when they have been committed doesnt it? Im not crazy the rest of you are i believe when someone says this the usual thing to do is increase there dosage of medication hoping they return to reality. Man someone get Putin a prescription quick maybe we can get the ex wife to do it im sure she would agree hes crazy. i had to laugh he was parading his girlfriend around at the Olympics and he looked like her dad.



posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by dragonridr
 


There's definately something wrong with him or his doing a good impression of someone who has lost complete touch and is seriously deluded.

As for his woman......apparently she has a couple of kids with him.



posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 11:22 PM
link   

TritonTaranis

pheonix358

TritonTaranis

pheonix358

xavi1000
The best way to handle an angry person like Putin is to simply turn on him and walk away, refusing to listen to his ranting. Words are not the solution to the nutty things a man says; firm, quiet, reasoned-out actions are. Reacting in anger to an angry person doesn't work. Watchful waiting and firmness do. If Western leaders act quietly, firmly and without wavering, this situation can be frozen at the point it is now and kept from spreading further. Now is the time to decide how to handle this , not when his next grab for power takes place. Putin has revealed his paranoia. When dealing with a paranoid person, one must 'talk him down' carefully, but always know he is essentially a loose cannon -- and always will be.


Putin is not the loose cannon here. You may like to look closer to home to find your loose cannon, in fact lots and lots of loose cannons. Start with the big white house in DC and spread out from there. McCain is a loose cannon, rusty too.

P


Yeah you're absolutely right.. Putin isn't a loose cannon here at all the world is on drugs and a bunch of liars



Thank you and I agree with you 100% on this single post of yours.

Putin is not a loose cannon.

The world is on drugs, yep, although you may put the US on top of that list, they have more people in jail for drugs than anyon else.

Bunch of liars, I assume you are talking of politicians and the media they own or control. Yes I agree although it is a bit like stating the bleeding obvious now, isn't it.

Never never thought I would see the day that we would agree on something. I am impressed!

P


Seems you're stereotyping and taring all with one brush to back up your claims continuously

Deny ignorance my friend

Ok to sum it up

Putin isn't a loose cannon...the rest of the civilised worlds leaders are

Because they're all on drugs which makes them lie often

In the words of dr evil... Rightttttttttttttttttttt






Oh Well done.

I was sarcastically responding to YOUR post! You said,




Yeah you're absolutely right.. Putin isn't a loose cannon here at all the world is on drugs and a bunch of liars


Then you have the mighty gall to accuse me!

THEY ARE YOUR WORDS ........ NICE TRY! .........FAIL!

I expect this from only two types, trolls and shills. I hope you are neither.

You have some nerve!

P

edit on 4/3/2014 by pheonix358 because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/3/2014 by pheonix358 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2014 @ 11:39 PM
link   

"COUGH"



Please keep the conversation on the topic and off each other.

Think before you post.



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:17 AM
link   
Oops...Double post.
edit on 5-3-2014 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:19 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:20 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:21 AM
link   

andy1972

Soloprotocol

Soloprotocol
If this is a Video of Ukrainian Neo Fascists in action I believe Putin has a point.
These people look organised enough to be a real concern.

They appear to be well armed...By Who is the question?

WARNING!! DEATH METAL MUSIC.

The video doesn't work..may i cry "CONSPIRACY"......


here was the link i used..
www.youtube.com...



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:23 AM
link   

Soloprotocol

andy1972

Soloprotocol

Soloprotocol
If this is a Video of Ukrainian Neo Fascists in action I believe Putin has a point.
These people look organised enough to be a real concern.

They appear to be well armed...By Who is the question?

WARNING!! DEATH METAL MUSIC.

The video doesn't work..may i cry "CONSPIRACY"......


here was the link i used..
www.youtube.com...


Now i may NOT cry conspiracy...as the link works....bugger.

And may i add, i've never seen so many blokes dressed in balaklavas, workmans helmets and wearing BMX protection in my life. After watching that video i'm convinced there's not a dustbin in Kiev that's still got a lid on it..as they've all got one as a shield..
I would'nt be suprised to see one or two with a blue face dressed in a kilt....

ETA - having watched the video - Russia has to protect a million ethnic Russians from the Kiev AIRSOFT CLUB ??
edit on AM3Wed20141972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)


(post by Willbert removed for a manners violation)

posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 12:58 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:03 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:06 AM
link   
Scott Rickard: "West has invested over five billion dollars in protests in Ukraine"
www.presstv.ir... ed-overthrow-in-ukraine/



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:15 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:17 AM
link   

statifik
Scott Rickard: "West has invested over five billion dollars in protests in Ukraine"
www.presstv.ir... ed-overthrow-in-ukraine/


You spend 5 BILLION in overthrowing the governemnt of a country...and it goes wrong....FAIL ARMY 2014..bummer.

Russia torpedoes everything doing the least expected.
edit on AM3Wed20141972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:20 AM
link   
What part of keep the posts on the topic and off each other is hard to understand?

Posting Bans may be soon to follow.



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 01:29 AM
link   


Posting Bans may be soon to follow.


That, with your avatar staring at me has quite an affect!

OK on topic.

Just where does 5 Billion dollars go when you try to force a regime change in opposition to the peoples democratic rights.

5 Billion is an enormousness amount. Where does it go. Who gets paid off. What do they spend it on. Certainly was not weapons!

I am at a loss to understand why it should cost 5 Billion.

At least Russia is more in your face, here we come (Well OK, they snuck in first)

P



posted on Mar, 5 2014 @ 02:13 AM
link   

DeadSeraph

Melbourne_Militia
Obama has stated he will not be agttending the next G8 meeting in protest....really? Gee, what a statement.

If Reagan was alive and in power now, he'd mobilize all US troops round the world to put forth a major statement of intent and protest against Putin.

Obama has no balls to put on the table. Times like this we need action....not more lines in the sand.


Yeah because world war 3 is totally the best possible outcome here...


Before I get started, please do some research into MK Ultra before mentioning Reagan in a positive light again. The results of this research will show you why this is such a mistake to make.

After that research you'll discover that when you mention Reagan in a political sense, you are actually referring to Henry Kissinger. You're more than welcome to prove me wrong ?



new topics

top topics



 
367
<< 118  119  120    122  123  124 >>

log in

join