posted on Mar, 3 2014 @ 11:10 AM
Springer's post seems to be bit confusing on a few levels and it seems to be born of some frustration. I think something is amiss.
Bashar has been around for ages, but in recent months more information emanating from him/Daryl has been coming into ATS posts for some reason. The
hate, the anger ,the venom, the shear volume of downright aggressive posts on any thread with the Bashar name attached is stunning - truly stunning.
If after 30 years of channeling he was just another voice in the wind then why all the hate?
I think it is common knowledge that our last president was a puppet. He "spoke" for folks who wish to remain unseen, so he was a channeler as the
term goes. He was told to say, "WMD means war with Iraq" and he wasn't called a hoaxer. His channeling resulted in a whole lot of dead people, and
Daryl's hasn't. Yet the hate for gw is nearly non existent. So it can't be channeling that is the issue as much as it is information.
And here is where things get awkward. If Daryl spoke this information as his own person we'd call him some other kind of name and damn him for trying
to make a living off of what he was selling - only pop stars, scientists, political leaders are allowed to eat using money they earn from any actions
selling information (all esoteric information must be given away for it to be valid according to the ATS wisdom). As a "channel" we have to see the
information in a different light? Or do we? Many accepted Tom Delay's vision from god as a valid reason for him to terrorize the government. Many
accept a reporter quoting an "unnamed source" as a valid information source. So are we talking information or the source of information? Does
information stand alone, or does the source matter more then anything? People argue Fox News topics here all the time and they are beyond garbage as a
source by even their own admission - they are entertainers.
The condemnation of Bashar by Springer is something else. Something in this information polarizes and antagonizes people beyond all rational
explanation. Much of the information is sound, much of it isn't even remotely controversial, yet this source has people bringing out the AK's to
shut him down and those who perpetuate him as an information source.
This alone suggests the information might be important, as the number of "he's a hoaxer, trash him now" posts on this thread are beyond reason. Too
many posts in any Bashar thread are exclusively designed to discredit - period. In fact, many are "one-off" posts where the poster isn't engaging
just hit and running.
All of that said, I agree that there can be none, zero, no rational discourse on any Bashar information on this site, as such the Hoax bin is needed
to keep Springer's sanity.