visit full thread |
board home |
site home |
recent posts |
top topics
It is amazing how you discount the NIST simulation showing the deflection...
We've got a theoric simulation and a "real" experiment that do not match at all.
Two choices:
a) The NIST simulation is wrong.
b) The WTC video is wrong.
PD: On the transparent plane... The picture speaks by itself, the "plane" (CG) is transparent... There is much more in there: the processed camera panning, etc. A total fabrication folks.
From Thread: Why there were no planes at the WTC
Posted by brainsucker, on October 2, 2006 at 12:16 GMTIt is amazing how you discount the NIST simulation showing the deflection...
We've got a theoric simulation and a "real" experiment that do not match at all.
Two choices:
a) The NIST simulation is wrong.
b) The WTC video is wrong.
PD: On the transparent plane... The picture speaks by itself, the "plane" (CG) is transparent... There is much more in there: the processed camera panning, etc. A total fabrication folks.
You may use this content as long as you comply with our Creative Commons Deed by properly sourcing the author as owner, source the AboveTopSecret.com website as co-owner, do not create a derivative work, and do not use it for commerical purposes.
